apunkt/omnigraph
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ModernRelay/omnigraph.git synced 2026-06-15 01:55:13 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
omnigraph/docs/dev/codeowners.md
aaltshuler b24bb16d0c ci(codeowners): restore ragnorc to engineering and docs roles 
Re-adds ragnorc to both roles in the source of truth and regenerates
CODEOWNERS + the ownership tables. This also resolves the standing
inconsistency from #169: branch-protection.json's
bypass_pull_request_allowances still listed ragnorc after his codeowners
removal — the two lists are in sync again (no protection change needed).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-12 13:45:33 +03:00

3.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Code ownership

.github/CODEOWNERS is generated — not hand-edited. The source of truth is .github/codeowners-roles.yml, expanded by .github/scripts/render-codeowners.py. CI rejects drift between the two and rejects direct edits to CODEOWNERS that don't accompany a yml change.

This setup gives every role change a reviewable PR and a permanent in-repository audit trail (git log .github/codeowners-roles.yml).

Who owns what

The tables below are generated from .github/codeowners-roles.yml by .github/scripts/render-codeowners.py (the same render that produces .github/CODEOWNERS). They are the always-current "who owns what at this commit" view — don't edit them by hand; edit the yml and re-render.

Path → owners (GitHub applies last match wins; the * catch-all is listed first and is overridden by the specific patterns below it):

Path Owners Role(s)
* @aaltshuler @ragnorc engineering
crates/** @aaltshuler @ragnorc engineering
docs/** @aaltshuler @ragnorc docs
README.md @aaltshuler @ragnorc docs
AGENTS.md @aaltshuler @ragnorc docs
CLAUDE.md @aaltshuler @ragnorc docs
SECURITY.md @aaltshuler @ragnorc docs

Roles:

Role Members Description
engineering @aaltshuler @ragnorc All production code under crates/**. Engine, CLI, server, compiler.
docs @aaltshuler @ragnorc Documentation under docs/**, plus repo-level docs (README.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md symlink, SECURITY.md).

GitHub treats multiple owners on a CODEOWNERS line as "any one of them satisfies the review requirement". To require N distinct approvers on a specific path, layer a CI check on top (not currently configured).

How to change role membership or path mappings

  1. Edit .github/codeowners-roles.yml.
  2. Open a PR. CI re-renders for you: the CODEOWNERS workflow regenerates .github/CODEOWNERS and the ownership tables above and auto-commits them back to your PR branch on same-repository PRs — you don't have to run the script locally (though you can: python3 .github/scripts/render-codeowners.py, requires PyYAML).

On a fork (where CI can't push back), the workflow instead fails with the diff so you can run the script and commit it yourself.

CI fails the PR if:

  • a fork PR left a generated artifact out of sync, or
  • CODEOWNERS was edited without a corresponding yml change (the CODEOWNERS not hand-edited check).

How to add a new role

  1. Add a new entry to roles: in the yml with a description and members list.
  2. Reference the role from paths: (or default:).
  3. Regenerate + commit as above.

Why a generator, not direct CODEOWNERS edits?

  • Audit trail: git log .github/codeowners-roles.yml is the canonical record of every role change. The rendered CODEOWNERS is a derived artifact.
  • Roles are first-class: paths reference roles, not raw handles. Renaming a person or rotating a role updates one place, not every path.
  • Future extension: scheduled rotation (weekly on-call, quarterly leads) plugs into the same yml without changing the path mappings. Not enabled today.
  • Consistency with the product: omnigraph itself enforces auditable Cedar policy. The repository's code-owner policy follows the same "policy as reviewed code" pattern.