mirror of
https://github.com/trustgraph-ai/trustgraph.git
synced 2026-07-19 18:21:03 +02:00
API docs
This commit is contained in:
parent
74ea3b8b96
commit
fe4a915e78
1 changed files with 53 additions and 0 deletions
53
docs/apis/README.md
Normal file
53
docs/apis/README.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# TrustGraph APIs overview
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If you want to interact with TrustGraph through APIs, there are 3
|
||||||
|
forms of API which may be of interest to you:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pulsar APIs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Apache Pulsar is a pub/sub system used to deliver messages between TrustGraph
|
||||||
|
components. Using Pulsar, you can communicate with TrustGraph components.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Pros:
|
||||||
|
- Provides complete access to all TrustGraph functionality
|
||||||
|
- Simple integration with metrics and observability
|
||||||
|
Cons:
|
||||||
|
- Integration is non-trivial, requires a special-purpose Pulsar client
|
||||||
|
library
|
||||||
|
- The Pulsar interfaces are likely something that you would not want to
|
||||||
|
expose outside of the processing cluster in a production or well-secured
|
||||||
|
deployment
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## REST APIs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A component, `api-gateway`, provides a bridge between Pulsar internals and
|
||||||
|
the REST API which allows many services to be invoked using REST APIs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Pros:
|
||||||
|
- Uses standard REST approach can be easily integrated into many kinds
|
||||||
|
of technology
|
||||||
|
- Can be easily protected with authentication and TLS for production-grade
|
||||||
|
or secure deployments
|
||||||
|
Cons:
|
||||||
|
- For a complex application, a long series of REST invocations has
|
||||||
|
latency and performance overheads - HTTP has limits on the number
|
||||||
|
of concurrent service invocations
|
||||||
|
- Lower coverage of functionality - service interfaces need to be added to
|
||||||
|
`api-gateway` to permit REST invocation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Websocket API
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The `api-gateway` component also provides access to services through a
|
||||||
|
websocket API.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Pros:
|
||||||
|
- Usable through a standard websocket library
|
||||||
|
- Can be easily protected with authentication and TLS for production-grade
|
||||||
|
or secure deployments
|
||||||
|
- Supports concurrent service invocations
|
||||||
|
Cons:
|
||||||
|
- Websocket service invocation is a little more complex to develop than
|
||||||
|
using a basic REST API, particular if you want to cover all of the error
|
||||||
|
scenarios well
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue