mirror of
https://github.com/trustgraph-ai/trustgraph.git
synced 2026-04-25 08:26:21 +02:00
156 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
156 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# Flow Class Definition Specification
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Overview
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A flow class defines a complete dataflow pattern template in the TrustGraph system. When instantiated, it creates an interconnected network of processors that handle data ingestion, processing, storage, and querying as a unified system.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Structure
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A flow class definition consists of four main sections:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 1. Class Section
|
||
|
|
Defines shared service processors that are instantiated once per flow class. These processors handle requests from all flow instances of this class.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```json
|
||
|
|
"class": {
|
||
|
|
"service-name:{class}": {
|
||
|
|
"request": "queue-pattern:{class}",
|
||
|
|
"response": "queue-pattern:{class}"
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Characteristics:**
|
||
|
|
- Shared across all flow instances of the same class
|
||
|
|
- Typically expensive or stateless services (LLMs, embedding models)
|
||
|
|
- Use `{class}` template variable for queue naming
|
||
|
|
- Examples: `embeddings:{class}`, `text-completion:{class}`, `graph-rag:{class}`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 2. Flow Section
|
||
|
|
Defines flow-specific processors that are instantiated for each individual flow instance. Each flow gets its own isolated set of these processors.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```json
|
||
|
|
"flow": {
|
||
|
|
"processor-name:{id}": {
|
||
|
|
"input": "queue-pattern:{id}",
|
||
|
|
"output": "queue-pattern:{id}"
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Characteristics:**
|
||
|
|
- Unique instance per flow
|
||
|
|
- Handle flow-specific data and state
|
||
|
|
- Use `{id}` template variable for queue naming
|
||
|
|
- Examples: `chunker:{id}`, `pdf-decoder:{id}`, `kg-extract-relationships:{id}`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 3. Interfaces Section
|
||
|
|
Defines the entry points and interaction contracts for the flow. These form the API surface for external systems and internal component communication.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Interfaces can take two forms:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Fire-and-Forget Pattern** (single queue):
|
||
|
|
```json
|
||
|
|
"interfaces": {
|
||
|
|
"document-load": "persistent://tg/flow/document-load:{id}",
|
||
|
|
"triples-store": "persistent://tg/flow/triples-store:{id}"
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Request/Response Pattern** (object with request/response fields):
|
||
|
|
```json
|
||
|
|
"interfaces": {
|
||
|
|
"embeddings": {
|
||
|
|
"request": "non-persistent://tg/request/embeddings:{class}",
|
||
|
|
"response": "non-persistent://tg/response/embeddings:{class}"
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Types of Interfaces:**
|
||
|
|
- **Entry Points**: Where external systems inject data (`document-load`, `agent`)
|
||
|
|
- **Service Interfaces**: Request/response patterns for services (`embeddings`, `text-completion`)
|
||
|
|
- **Data Interfaces**: Fire-and-forget data flow connection points (`triples-store`, `entity-contexts-load`)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 4. Metadata
|
||
|
|
Additional information about the flow class:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```json
|
||
|
|
"description": "Human-readable description",
|
||
|
|
"tags": ["capability-1", "capability-2"]
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Template Variables
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### {id}
|
||
|
|
- Replaced with the unique flow instance identifier
|
||
|
|
- Creates isolated resources for each flow
|
||
|
|
- Example: `flow-123`, `customer-A-flow`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### {class}
|
||
|
|
- Replaced with the flow class name
|
||
|
|
- Creates shared resources across flows of the same class
|
||
|
|
- Example: `standard-rag`, `enterprise-rag`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Queue Patterns (Pulsar)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Flow classes use Apache Pulsar for messaging. Queue names follow the Pulsar format:
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
<persistence>://<tenant>/<namespace>/<topic>
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Components:
|
||
|
|
- **persistence**: `persistent` or `non-persistent` (Pulsar persistence mode)
|
||
|
|
- **tenant**: `tg` for TrustGraph-supplied flow class definitions
|
||
|
|
- **namespace**: Indicates the messaging pattern
|
||
|
|
- `flow`: Fire-and-forget services
|
||
|
|
- `request`: Request portion of request/response services
|
||
|
|
- `response`: Response portion of request/response services
|
||
|
|
- **topic**: The specific queue/topic name with template variables
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Persistent Queues
|
||
|
|
- Pattern: `persistent://tg/flow/<topic>:{id}`
|
||
|
|
- Used for fire-and-forget services and durable data flow
|
||
|
|
- Data persists in Pulsar storage across restarts
|
||
|
|
- Example: `persistent://tg/flow/chunk-load:{id}`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Non-Persistent Queues
|
||
|
|
- Pattern: `non-persistent://tg/request/<topic>:{class}` or `non-persistent://tg/response/<topic>:{class}`
|
||
|
|
- Used for request/response messaging patterns
|
||
|
|
- Ephemeral, not persisted to disk by Pulsar
|
||
|
|
- Lower latency, suitable for RPC-style communication
|
||
|
|
- Example: `non-persistent://tg/request/embeddings:{class}`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Dataflow Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The flow class creates a unified dataflow where:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. **Document Processing Pipeline**: Flows from ingestion through transformation to storage
|
||
|
|
2. **Query Services**: Integrated processors that query the same data stores and services
|
||
|
|
3. **Shared Services**: Centralized processors that all flows can utilize
|
||
|
|
4. **Storage Writers**: Persist processed data to appropriate stores
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
All processors (both `{id}` and `{class}`) work together as a cohesive dataflow graph, not as separate systems.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Example Flow Instantiation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Given:
|
||
|
|
- Flow Instance ID: `customer-A-flow`
|
||
|
|
- Flow Class: `standard-rag`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Template expansions:
|
||
|
|
- `persistent://tg/flow/chunk-load:{id}` → `persistent://tg/flow/chunk-load:customer-A-flow`
|
||
|
|
- `non-persistent://tg/request/embeddings:{class}` → `non-persistent://tg/request/embeddings:standard-rag`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This creates:
|
||
|
|
- Isolated document processing pipeline for `customer-A-flow`
|
||
|
|
- Shared embedding service for all `standard-rag` flows
|
||
|
|
- Complete dataflow from document ingestion through querying
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Benefits
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. **Resource Efficiency**: Expensive services are shared across flows
|
||
|
|
2. **Flow Isolation**: Each flow has its own data processing pipeline
|
||
|
|
3. **Scalability**: Can instantiate multiple flows from the same template
|
||
|
|
4. **Modularity**: Clear separation between shared and flow-specific components
|
||
|
|
5. **Unified Architecture**: Query and processing are part of the same dataflow
|