mirror of
https://github.com/katanemo/plano.git
synced 2026-05-15 11:02:39 +02:00
Doc Update (#129)
* init update * Update terminology.rst * fix the branch to create an index.html, and fix pre-commit issues * Doc update * made several changes to the docs after Shuguang's revision * fixing pre-commit issues * fixed the reference file to the final prompt config file * added google analytics --------- Co-authored-by: Salman Paracha <salmanparacha@MacBook-Pro-261.local>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2a7b95582c
commit
5c7567584d
49 changed files with 1185 additions and 609 deletions
176
docs/source/concepts/tech_overview/request_lifecycle.rst
Normal file
176
docs/source/concepts/tech_overview/request_lifecycle.rst
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
|
|||
.. _lifecycle_of_a_request:
|
||||
|
||||
Request Lifecycle
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
Below we describe the events in the lifecycle of a request passing through an Arch gateway instance. We first
|
||||
describe how Arch fits into the request path and then the internal events that take place following
|
||||
the arrival of a request at Arch from downtream clients. We follow the request until the corresponding
|
||||
dispatch upstream and the response path.
|
||||
|
||||
.. image:: /_static/img/network-topology-ingress-egress.jpg
|
||||
:width: 100%
|
||||
:align: center
|
||||
|
||||
Terminology
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
|
||||
We recommend that you get familiar with some of the :ref:`terminology <arch_terminology>` used in Arch
|
||||
before reading this section.
|
||||
|
||||
Network topology
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
How a request flows through the components in a network (including Arch) depends on the network’s topology.
|
||||
Arch can be used in a wide variety of networking topologies. We focus on the inner operation of Arch below,
|
||||
but briefly we address how Arch relates to the rest of the network in this section.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Downstream(Ingress)** listeners take requests from upstream clients like a web UI or clients that forward
|
||||
prompts to you local application responses from the application flow back through Arch to the downstream.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Upstream(Egress)** listeners take requests from the application and forward them to LLMs.
|
||||
|
||||
.. image:: /_static/img/network-topology-ingress-egress.jpg
|
||||
:width: 100%
|
||||
:align: center
|
||||
|
||||
In practice, Arch can be deployed on the edge and as an internal load balancer between AI agents. A request path may
|
||||
traverse multiple Arch gateways:
|
||||
|
||||
.. image:: /_static/img/network-topology-agent.jpg
|
||||
:width: 100%
|
||||
:align: center
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
High level architecture
|
||||
-----------------------
|
||||
Arch is a set of **two** self-contained processes that are designed to run alongside your application servers
|
||||
(or on a separate server connected to your application servers via a network). The first process is designated
|
||||
to manage HTTP-level networking and connection management concerns (protocol management, request id generation,
|
||||
header sanitization, etc.), and the other process is for **model serving**, which helps Arch make intelligent
|
||||
decisions about the incoming prompts. The model server hosts the purpose-built LLMs to
|
||||
manage several critical, but undifferentiated, prompt related tasks on behalf of developers.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The request processing path in Arch has three main parts:
|
||||
|
||||
* :ref:`Listener subsystem <arch_overview_listeners>` which handles **downstream** and **upstream** request
|
||||
processing. It is responsible for managing the downstream (ingress) and the upstream (egress) request
|
||||
lifecycle. The downstream and upstream HTTP/2 codec lives here.
|
||||
* :ref:`Prompt handler subsystem <arch_overview_prompt_handling>` which is responsible for selecting and
|
||||
forwarding prompts ``prompt_targets`` and establishes the lifecycle of any **upstream** connection to a
|
||||
hosted endpoint that implements domain-specific business logic for incoming promots. This is where knowledge
|
||||
of targets and endpoint health, load balancing and connection pooling exists.
|
||||
* :ref:`Model serving subsystem <arch_model_serving>` which helps Arch make intelligent decisions about the
|
||||
incoming prompts. The model server is designed to call the purpose-built LLMs in Arch.
|
||||
|
||||
The three subsystems are bridged with either the HTTP router filter, and the cluster manager subsystems of Envoy.
|
||||
|
||||
Also, Arch utilizes `Envoy event-based thread model <https://blog.envoyproxy.io/envoy-threading-model-a8d44b922310>`_.
|
||||
A main thread is responsible forthe server lifecycle, configuration processing, stats, etc. and some number of
|
||||
:ref:`worker threads <arch_overview_threading>` process requests. All threads operate around an event loop (`libevent <https://libevent.org/>`_)
|
||||
and any given downstream TCP connection will be handled by exactly one worker thread for its lifetime. Each worker
|
||||
thread maintains its own pool of TCP connections to upstream endpoints.
|
||||
|
||||
Worker threads rarely share state and operate in a trivially parallel fashion. This threading model
|
||||
enables scaling to very high core count CPUs.
|
||||
|
||||
Configuration
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
|
||||
Today, only support a static bootstrap configuration file for simplicity today:
|
||||
|
||||
.. literalinclude:: ../includes/arch_config.yaml
|
||||
:language: yaml
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Request Flow (Ingress)
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Overview
|
||||
^^^^^^^^
|
||||
A brief outline of the lifecycle of a request and response using the example configuration above:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **TCP Connection Establishment**:
|
||||
A TCP connection from downstream is accepted by an Arch listener running on a worker thread.
|
||||
The listener filter chain provides SNI and other pre-TLS information. The transport socket, typically TLS,
|
||||
decrypts incoming data for processing.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Prompt Guardrails Check**:
|
||||
Arch first checks the incoming prompts for guardrails such as jailbreak attempts. This ensures
|
||||
that harmful or unwanted behaviors are detected early in the request processing pipeline.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Intent Matching**:
|
||||
The decrypted data stream is deframed by the HTTP/2 codec in Arch's HTTP connection manager. Arch performs
|
||||
intent matching via is **prompt-handler** subsystem using the name and description of the defined prompt targets,
|
||||
determining which endpoint should handle the prompt.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Parameter Gathering with Arch-FC**:
|
||||
If a prompt target requires specific parameters, Arch engages Arch-FC to extract the necessary details
|
||||
from the incoming prompt(s). This process gathers the critical information needed for downstream API calls.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **API Call Execution**:
|
||||
Arch routes the prompt to the appropriate backend API or function call. If an endpoint cluster is identified,
|
||||
load balancing is performed, circuit breakers are checked, and the request is proxied to the upstream endpoint.
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Default Summarization by Upstream LLM**:
|
||||
By default, if no specific endpoint processing is needed, the prompt is sent to an upstream LLM for summarization.
|
||||
This ensures that responses are concise and relevant, enhancing user experience in RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)
|
||||
and agentic applications.
|
||||
|
||||
7. **Error Handling and Forwarding**:
|
||||
Errors encountered during processing, such as failed function calls or guardrail detections, are forwarded to
|
||||
designated error targets. Error details are communicated through specific headers to the application:
|
||||
|
||||
- ``X-Function-Error-Code``: Code indicating the type of function call error.
|
||||
- ``X-Prompt-Guard-Error-Code``: Code specifying violations detected by prompt guardrails.
|
||||
- Additional headers carry messages and timestamps to aid in debugging and logging.
|
||||
|
||||
8. **Response Handling**:
|
||||
The upstream endpoint’s TLS transport socket encrypts the response, which is then proxied back downstream.
|
||||
Responses pass through HTTP filters in reverse order, ensuring any necessary processing or modification before final delivery.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Request Flow (Egress)
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Overview
|
||||
--------
|
||||
|
||||
A brief outline of the lifecycle of a request and response in the context of egress traffic from an application
|
||||
to Large Language Models (LLMs) via Arch:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **HTTP Connection Establishment to LLM**:
|
||||
Arch initiates an HTTP connection to the upstream LLM service. This connection is handled by Arch’s egress listener
|
||||
running on a worker thread. The connection typically uses a secure transport protocol such as HTTPS, ensuring the
|
||||
prompt data is encrypted before being sent to the LLM service.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Rate Limiting**:
|
||||
Before sending the request to the LLM, Arch applies rate-limiting policies to ensure that the upstream LLM service
|
||||
is not overwhelmed by excessive traffic. Rate limits are enforced per client or service, ensuring fair usage and
|
||||
preventing accidental or malicious overload. If the rate limit is exceeded, Arch may return an appropriate HTTP
|
||||
error (e.g., 429 Too Many Requests) without sending the prompt to the LLM.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Load Balancing to (hosted) LLM Endpoints**:
|
||||
After passing the rate-limiting checks, Arch routes the prompt to the appropriate LLM endpoint.
|
||||
If multiple LLM providers instances are available, load balancing is performed to distribute traffic evenly
|
||||
across the instances. Arch checks the health of the LLM endpoints using circuit breakers and health checks,
|
||||
ensuring that the prompt is only routed to a healthy, responsive instance.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Response Reception and Forwarding**:
|
||||
Once the LLM processes the prompt, Arch receives the response from the LLM service. The response is typically a
|
||||
generated text, completion, or summarization. Upon reception, Arch decrypts (if necessary) and handles the response,
|
||||
passing it through any egress processing pipeline defined by the application, such as logging or additional response filtering.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Post-request processing
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
Once a request completes, the stream is destroyed. The following also takes places:
|
||||
|
||||
* The post-request :ref:`monitoring <monitoring>` are updated (e.g. timing, active requests, upgrades, health checks).
|
||||
Some statistics are updated earlier however, during request processing. Stats are batchedand written by the main
|
||||
thread periodically.
|
||||
* :ref:`Access logs <arch_access_logging>` are written to the access log
|
||||
* :ref:`Trace <arch_overview_tracing>` spans are finalized. If our example request was traced, a
|
||||
trace span, describing the duration and details of the request would be created by the HCM when
|
||||
processing request headers and then finalized by the HCM during post-request processing.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue