The bot-review pass and the subsequent coverage audit surfaced two material gaps in PR #119's test surface — both easy to close, both worth closing before merge. * **Gap 1 — cluster-route sweep.** The Bug-1 path-extractor regression slipped through because `cluster_routes_dispatch_per_graph_handle` only exercised `/snapshot`. The other six protected cluster routes (`/read`, `/change`, `/export`, `/schema`, `/schema/apply`, `/ingest`, `/branches/merge`) were implicitly trusted to work without any multi-mode integration test. Add `all_protected_cluster_routes_resolve_to_their_handler` (`tests/server.rs`) that hits each protected cluster route with a minimal request and asserts the response is consistent with the handler being reached — no 404 (router didn't match), no 500 with "Wrong number of path arguments" (Bug-1 class), no 500 with "missing extension" (routing middleware didn't inject the handle). Status code is a negative assertion because each handler's happy-path inputs differ; what matters is "the request reached the handler," not "the handler returned 200" — that's already pinned by the single-mode tests. * **Gap 2 — `--force` happy path.** The strict re-init regression test (`init_on_existing_graph_uri_does_not_destroy_existing_schema`) pins the error path; nothing pinned the `force: true` escape hatch actually doing what its docstring claims. Add `init_with_force_recovers_from_orphan_schema_files` (`tests/lifecycle.rs`). Writes a bare `_schema.pg` to simulate orphan files from a failed prior init, confirms strict mode bails as expected, then confirms `init_with_options(force: true)` succeeds and produces a functional graph. Note: the test follows the documented semantics — force skips the preflight only, it does NOT purge existing Lance state. An earlier draft of the test (against full overwrite of an existing populated graph) failed because `GraphCoordinator::init` errored on the existing `__manifest`, which is exactly the limitation the `InitOptions::force` docstring already calls out. Recursive purge needs `StorageAdapter::delete_prefix` (tracked separately). Coverage is now fully aligned with the PR's claims. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .cargo | ||
| .context | ||
| .github | ||
| crates | ||
| docker | ||
| docs | ||
| scripts | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| AGENTS.md | ||
| Cargo.lock | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| Dockerfile | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| og-cheet-sheet.md | ||
| omnigraph.example.yaml | ||
| openapi.json | ||
| README.md | ||
| rust-toolchain.toml | ||
| SECURITY.md | ||
Omnigraph
Object-storage native knowledge graph with git-style workflows. Designed for agents and humans to collaborate on shared structured knowledge.
Turns fragmented context into a live graph, lets humans and agents coordinate through that graph, and uses branches so agent-generated changes can be reviewed and merged safely.
Built on Rust, Arrow, DataFusion and Lance.
Join the Omnigraph Slack community
Use Cases
- Company brain / Second brain
- Context graph
- Knowledge base for multi-agent research
- Incident response graph
- Compliance & audit graph
Capabilities
- Typed schema, typed queries, and typed mutations
- Native blob-as-data support (docs, images, videos, etc)
- Schema-as-code, query validation and linting
- Git-style graph workflows: branches, commits, merges, and transactional runs
- Local, on-prem & cloud S3-native storage with snapshot-pinned reads
- Graph traversal + text, fuzzy, BM25, vector, and RRF search in one runtime
- Policy-as-code for server-side access control
- Single CLI for multiple deployments
Quick Install
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ModernRelay/omnigraph/main/scripts/install.sh | bash
This installs omnigraph and omnigraph-server into ~/.local/bin from
published release binaries.
Or install with Homebrew:
brew tap ModernRelay/tap
brew install ModernRelay/tap/omnigraph
For starter graphs and agent skills to bootstrap and operate Omnigraph, see ModernRelay/omnigraph-cookbooks.
One-Command Local RustFS Bootstrap
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ModernRelay/omnigraph/main/scripts/local-rustfs-bootstrap.sh | bash
That bootstrap:
- starts RustFS on
127.0.0.1:9000 - creates a bucket and S3-backed graph
- loads the checked-in context fixture
- launches
omnigraph-serveron127.0.0.1:8080
Docker must be installed and running first.
The RustFS bootstrap prefers the rolling edge binaries and only falls back to
source builds when release assets are unavailable.
If a previous run left objects under the same graph prefix but did not finish
initializing the graph, rerun with RESET_REPO=1 or set PREFIX to a new
value.
Common Commands
The same URI works for local paths, s3://…, or http://host:port.
omnigraph init --schema ./schema.pg ./graph.omni
omnigraph load --data ./data.jsonl ./graph.omni
omnigraph read --query ./queries.gq --name get_person --params '{"name":"Alice"}' ./graph.omni
omnigraph change --query ./queries.gq --name insert_person --params '{"name":"Mina"}' ./graph.omni
omnigraph branch create --from main feature-x ./graph.omni
omnigraph branch merge feature-x --into main ./graph.omni
See docs/user/cli.md for schema apply, snapshots, ingest, runs, and policy commands.
Docs
Build And Test
cargo build --workspace
cargo check --workspace
cargo test --workspace
Notes:
- Rust stable toolchain, edition 2024
- CI runs
cargo test --workspace --locked - Full CI and some local test flows require
protobuf-compiler - S3 integration tests expect an S3-compatible endpoint such as RustFS
Workspace Crates
crates/omnigraph-compiler: shared schema/query parser, typechecker, catalog, and IR loweringcrates/omnigraph: storage/runtime, branching, merge, change detection, and query executioncrates/omnigraph-cli: CLI for init/load/ingest/read/change/branch/snapshot/export/policy operationscrates/omnigraph-server: Axum HTTP server for remote reads, changes, ingest, export, branches, commits, and runs
Contributing
Please open an issue, spec, or design discussion before sending large code changes. Design feedback and concrete problem statements are the fastest way to collaborate on the roadmap.
Community
Join the Omnigraph Slack community to ask questions, share feedback, and follow development.