* MR-786: merge-pair truth table with exhaustive op-variant matrix
Add crates/omnigraph/tests/merge_truth_table.rs that enumerates every
(left_op, right_op) cell from the operation vocabulary named in the
ticket — {noop, addNode, removeNode, addEdge, removeEdge, setProperty,
dropProperty, addLabel, removeLabel} — and asserts the deterministic
outcome of Omnigraph::branch_merge against a structured oracle.
The matrix is built in a 9x9 match in build_case, so adding a new
OpVariant is a compile-time, fail-on-omission task. Today's mutation
grammar only exposes insert | update set | delete (see
docs/query-language.md), so the 36 cells over the first six ops are
executable and the 45 cells involving dropProperty/addLabel/removeLabel
are recorded as Expected::Unsupported with a note. Each executable cell
spins up a fresh tempdir, applies one mutation per branch, calls
branch_merge, and asserts either:
* MergeOutcome (AlreadyUpToDate / FastForward / Merged) plus a
GraphAssert on the affected entities, or
* an OmniError::MergeConflicts whose entries match the expected
table_key + MergeConflictKind (row_id is optional because edge
ULIDs are generated at runtime).
branch_merge is directional, so the (L, R) and (R, L) cells live in
separate entries in the matrix and are run independently — the
op-pair symmetry encoded in build_case serves as the commutativity
oracle without doubling the runtime. End-to-end the suite runs in
~10s on a fresh build, well under the 30s budget asserted at the
bottom of the test.
Also adds a row to docs/testing.md so the test-coverage map points
future agents at this file.
Co-Authored-By: Ragnor Comerford <ragnor.comerford@gmail.com>
* Use one Omnigraph handle for both branches
Self-review caught that the runner was opening two Omnigraph handles
on the same temp dataset (one for main, a second via Omnigraph::open
for feature). tests/branching.rs uses one handle and passes the branch
name to mutate_branch — same pattern works here and avoids any
cache-coherency surprises between the two handles. Also drops the
post-merge reopen, which only existed to give the second handle a
fresh snapshot.
Runtime drops ~10s -> ~9s.
Co-Authored-By: Ragnor Comerford <ragnor.comerford@gmail.com>
* Assert exact conflict count, not subset inclusion
cubic and Devin Review both flagged that check_outcome's
Expected::Conflicts arm only enforces want ⊆ got, so a regression that
produces a spurious extra conflict (e.g. emitting both OrphanEdge and
a stray DivergentInsert) would silently pass the truth-table cell.
For a deterministic oracle that's the wrong direction — the cell pins
the exact conflict-artifact set, not a lower bound. Add an
assert_eq!(got.len(), want.len()) before the existence loop. All 36
executable cells still pass; runtime unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Ragnor Comerford <ragnor.comerford@gmail.com>
* Subsume 4 conflict tests in branching.rs into truth table
The four `branch_merge_reports_*_conflict` tests
(DivergentUpdate / DivergentInsert / DeleteVsUpdate / OrphanEdge)
were redundant with the deterministic-oracle cells in the new
`merge_truth_table.rs` and only added drift risk.
To preserve the post-conflict invariant that lived in
`branch_merge_reports_divergent_update_conflict` (target unchanged
after a failed merge), the truth-table runner now generalizes it:
on every `Conflicts` cell, main's state is asserted against
`state_after_apply_only(right_op)`. That gives strictly more
coverage than the deleted tests carried, since the invariant now
applies to *all* seven conflict cells, not just one.
The `UniqueViolation` and `CardinalityViolation` cases stay in
`branching.rs` — they're combinatorial (require >1 op per side
with a non-default schema) and out of scope for the pair-wise
truth table.
Co-Authored-By: Ragnor Comerford <ragnor.comerford@gmail.com>
* Fix misleading 'Total edges: 0' comment in (AddEdge, RemoveEdge) cell
Devin Review flagged that the comment said 'Total edges: 0' while the
parenthetical math evaluates to 1 (matching `GraphAssert::base()`).
The assertion is correct; only the leading number in the comment was
wrong. Reworded to 'Net edges: … = 1 (matches base)' so the prose
agrees with both the math and the assertion.
Co-Authored-By: Ragnor Comerford <ragnor.comerford@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Ragnor <ragnor@modernrelay.com>
Co-authored-by: Ragnor Comerford <ragnor.comerford@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .cargo | ||
| .context | ||
| .github/workflows | ||
| crates | ||
| docker | ||
| docs | ||
| scripts | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| AGENTS.md | ||
| Cargo.lock | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| Dockerfile | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| og-cheet-sheet.md | ||
| omnigraph.example.yaml | ||
| openapi.json | ||
| README.md | ||
| rust-toolchain.toml | ||
| SECURITY.md | ||
Omnigraph
Lakehouse-native graph engine with git-style workflows.
Branch, commit, and merge typed graph data like source code. Multi-modal, self-hosted, open source.
Built on Rust, Arrow, DataFusion and Lance.
Join the Omnigraph Slack community
Use Cases
- Company brains
- Context graphs
- Backbone for multi-agent research
- Incident response graphs
- Compliance & audit graphs
- Enterprise knowledge systems
Capabilities
- Typed schema, typed queries, and typed mutations
- Schema-as-code, query validation and linting
- Git-style graph workflows: branches, commits, merges, and transactional runs
- Local, on-prem & cloud S3-native storage with snapshot-pinned reads
- Graph traversal + text, fuzzy, BM25, vector, and RRF search in one runtime
- Policy-as-code for server-side access control
- Single CLI for multiple deployments
Quick Install
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ModernRelay/omnigraph/main/scripts/install.sh | bash
This installs omnigraph and omnigraph-server into ~/.local/bin from
published release binaries.
Or install with Homebrew:
brew tap ModernRelay/tap
brew install ModernRelay/tap/omnigraph
For starter graphs and agent skills to bootstrap and operate Omnigraph, see ModernRelay/omnigraph-cookbooks.
One-Command Local RustFS Bootstrap
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ModernRelay/omnigraph/main/scripts/local-rustfs-bootstrap.sh | bash
That bootstrap:
- starts RustFS on
127.0.0.1:9000 - creates a bucket and S3-backed repo
- loads the checked-in context fixture
- launches
omnigraph-serveron127.0.0.1:8080
Docker must be installed and running first.
The RustFS bootstrap prefers the rolling edge binaries and only falls back to
source builds when release assets are unavailable.
If a previous run left objects under the same repo prefix but did not finish
initializing the repo, rerun with RESET_REPO=1 or set PREFIX to a new
value.
Common Commands
The same URI works for local paths, s3://…, or http://host:port.
omnigraph init --schema ./schema.pg ./repo.omni
omnigraph load --data ./data.jsonl ./repo.omni
omnigraph read --query ./queries.gq --name get_person --params '{"name":"Alice"}' ./repo.omni
omnigraph change --query ./queries.gq --name insert_person --params '{"name":"Mina"}' ./repo.omni
omnigraph branch create --from main feature-x ./repo.omni
omnigraph branch merge feature-x --into main ./repo.omni
See docs/cli.md for schema apply, snapshots, ingest, runs, and policy commands.
Docs
Build And Test
cargo build --workspace
cargo check --workspace
cargo test --workspace
Notes:
- Rust stable toolchain, edition 2024
- CI runs
cargo test --workspace --locked - Full CI and some local test flows require
protobuf-compiler - S3 integration tests expect an S3-compatible endpoint such as RustFS
Workspace Crates
crates/omnigraph-compiler: shared schema/query parser, typechecker, catalog, and IR loweringcrates/omnigraph: storage/runtime, branching, merge, change detection, and query executioncrates/omnigraph-cli: CLI for init/load/ingest/read/change/branch/snapshot/export/policy operationscrates/omnigraph-server: Axum HTTP server for remote reads, changes, ingest, export, branches, commits, and runs
Contributing
Please open an issue, spec, or design discussion before sending large code changes. Design feedback and concrete problem statements are the fastest way to collaborate on the roadmap.
Community
Join the Omnigraph Slack community to ask questions, share feedback, and follow development.