mirror of
https://github.com/ModernRelay/omnigraph.git
synced 2026-06-12 01:45:14 +02:00
PR 6a of the MR-668 multi-graph server work. Policy-crate-only refactor —
no HTTP handler changes, no operator-supplied policy.yaml changes. Sets
up the chassis that PR 6b's `GET /graphs` consumes.
Two new `PolicyAction` variants:
- `GraphCreate` — gates `POST /graphs` (deferred behavioral PR).
- `GraphList` — gates `GET /graphs` (lands in PR 6b).
Note: `GraphDelete` is intentionally NOT added in this PR. `DELETE
/graphs/{id}` is deferred from MR-668's v0.7.0 scope to bound complexity
(no `delete_prefix`, no tombstone, no `RegistryLookup::Tombstoned`).
Adding the Cedar action without a consumer would be the same kind of
"dead vocabulary" trap the `Admin` variant already documents.
New `PolicyResourceKind { Graph, Server }` enum, plus a
`PolicyAction::resource_kind()` method that classifies every action.
Per-graph actions (Read, Change, BranchCreate, …) bind to
`Omnigraph::Graph::"<graph_label>"`; server-scoped actions
(GraphCreate, GraphList) bind to the singleton
`Omnigraph::Server::"root"`. `Admin` stays classified as per-graph for
now — MR-724 will pick the final shape when the first consumer surface
ships.
Cedar schema string additions:
- `entity Server;`
- `action "graph_create" appliesTo { principal: Actor, resource: Server, ... }`
- `action "graph_list" appliesTo { principal: Actor, resource: Server, ... }`
Compiler updates:
- `compile_policy_source` picks the resource literal based on the
action's `resource_kind`. Existing graph-only policies generate
the same Cedar source as before — pinned by
`per_graph_rules_continue_to_work_alongside_server_rules`.
- `compile_entities` includes the `Server::"root"` entity only when
a rule references a server-scoped action. Keeps test assertions
for graph-only policies tight.
- `PolicyEngine::authorize` builds the right resource UID at
request time based on `request.action.resource_kind()`.
Validation rules added to `PolicyConfig::validate`:
- A rule may not mix server-scoped and per-graph actions (different
resource kinds need different `permit` clauses).
- Server-scoped actions cannot have `branch_scope` or
`target_branch_scope` — there's no branch context at the server
level.
Operator impact: zero. The Cedar schema `Omnigraph::Server` entity is
internally referenced by `compile_policy_source`; operator policy.yaml
files only declare actions in `rules[].allow.actions` and never
reference the resource entity directly. Decision 6's "internal rename
only; operator policies unaffected" contract is preserved and pinned
by `per_graph_rules_continue_to_work_alongside_server_rules`.
Tests: 5 new (11 policy tests total, up from 6):
- `graph_list_action_authorizes_against_server_resource`
- `graph_create_action_authorizes_against_server_resource`
- `server_scoped_rule_cannot_use_branch_scope`
- `rule_mixing_server_and_per_graph_actions_is_rejected`
- `per_graph_rules_continue_to_work_alongside_server_rules`
No regression: 145 server tests (74 lib + 71 integration) still green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| omnigraph | ||
| omnigraph-cli | ||
| omnigraph-compiler | ||
| omnigraph-policy | ||
| omnigraph-server | ||