omnigraph/research/lance-autoresearch
Claude 0d72cc69fb
research: restructure lance-autoresearch as multi-target workspace
The original lance-autoresearch was one Cargo crate optimizing one Lance
kernel (PQ L2 distance). With 9+ candidate targets enumerated in the research
note, a single-crate shape doesn't scale: per-target deps will collide, the
agent's edits to one target's kernels.rs would conflict with another's lib
path, and build/test isolation is lost. Restructure into a Cargo workspace.

Layout:

  research/lance-autoresearch/
  ├── Cargo.toml          (workspace root)
  ├── README.md           (target table, contract overview, repo layout)
  ├── HARNESS.md          (universal loop contract every target inherits)
  ├── crates/
  │   ├── harness-common/ (shared: SplitMix64, geomean, peak RSS,
  │   │                    MAX_ABS_ERR, TOPK_DIST_TOL, TIME_BUDGET_SECS)
  │   └── pq-l2/          (the landed target; was the previous single crate)
  └── docs/
      ├── design.md           (rationale for workspace shape, no Target trait)
      ├── adding-a-target.md  (step-by-step workflow for new targets)
      └── targets/pq-l2.md    (per-target capsule)

Decisions documented in docs/design.md:

- Workspace, not single crate: per-target Cargo.toml so deps don't collide;
  per-target src tree so agent edits don't conflict; per-target build/test
  isolation for faster agent iteration.
- harness-common as a plumbing-only crate (PRNG, geomean, peak RSS, tolerance
  constants, time budget). Intentionally NO Target trait - decode kernel
  signatures and distance kernel signatures differ enough that a unifying
  trait would either bloat or require erased boxing. Each target is its own
  natural shape.
- Per-target program.md + shared HARNESS.md: the loop contract is universal,
  the priors and API spec are per-target. Two files instead of one because
  copy-pasting the universal loop into every program.md would drift.

pq-l2 refactor:
- src/* moved into crates/pq-l2/src/* via git mv (preserves history)
- crate renamed lance-autoresearch -> pq-l2
- SplitMix64, geomean, peak_rss_mb, MAX_ABS_ERR, TOPK_DIST_TOL,
  TIME_BUDGET_SECS now imported from harness-common (drops ~70 lines of
  duplication that would have been copy-pasted into every new target)
- program.md trimmed: setup/loop/hygiene moved to HARNESS.md; only the
  PQ-L2-specific API contract and SIMD priors remain
- Cargo.toml depends on harness-common via path; workspace.dependencies
  pins criterion uniformly across targets

The 9 candidate targets from the research note (A1 cosine/dot/hamming, A2
IVF partition select, A3 FTS BM25, A4 bitpack decode, A5 dictionary decode,
A6 FSST decode, A7 take/gather, A8 predicate eval, A9 posting list intersect,
A10 top-K merge) are listed in README.md's target table as "candidate"; each
gets a docs/targets/<name>.md capsule when it's spun up. docs/adding-a-target.md
documents the cp -r + edit-Cargo.toml + rewrite-three-files workflow.

Verified end-to-end:
- cargo build --release: clean, both crates compile
- cargo clippy --release --workspace --all-targets -- -D warnings: clean
- cargo test --release --workspace: 6/6 pass (4 harness-common + 2 pq-l2)
- cargo run --release --bin run_experiment -p pq-l2: correctness pass,
  geomean ~880k ns, exit 0, ~30s wall-clock
- omnigraph parent workspace unchanged (research/ excluded as before)

https://claude.ai/code/session_01Aq8kBUcjmEPobcEufnWbW5
2026-05-15 00:15:02 +00:00
..
crates research: restructure lance-autoresearch as multi-target workspace 2026-05-15 00:15:02 +00:00
docs research: restructure lance-autoresearch as multi-target workspace 2026-05-15 00:15:02 +00:00
.gitignore research: lance-autoresearch — PQ L2 kernel autoresearch harness 2026-05-14 22:38:39 +00:00
Cargo.toml research: restructure lance-autoresearch as multi-target workspace 2026-05-15 00:15:02 +00:00
HARNESS.md research: restructure lance-autoresearch as multi-target workspace 2026-05-15 00:15:02 +00:00
LICENSE-APACHE research: lance-autoresearch — PQ L2 kernel autoresearch harness 2026-05-14 22:38:39 +00:00
LICENSE-MIT research: lance-autoresearch — PQ L2 kernel autoresearch harness 2026-05-14 22:38:39 +00:00
README.md research: restructure lance-autoresearch as multi-target workspace 2026-05-15 00:15:02 +00:00
rust-toolchain.toml research: lance-autoresearch — PQ L2 kernel autoresearch harness 2026-05-14 22:38:39 +00:00

lance-autoresearch

A multi-target workspace for evolving Lance hot-path kernels via LLM coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in the style of Andrej Karpathy's nanochat-research single-agent autoresearch loop.

Each target is an independent Rust crate under crates/:

Target Status Lance source area What's optimized
crates/pq-l2 landed lance-linalg::distance::l2, PQ probe PQ L2 distance: build LUT, probe codes, top-K
crates/pq-cosine candidate (A1) lance-linalg::distance::cosine PQ cosine distance
crates/pq-dot candidate (A1) lance-linalg::distance::dot PQ dot-product distance
crates/ivf-partition candidate (A2) lance-index::vector::ivf partition select IVF partition selection (centroid scan)
crates/fts-bm25 candidate (A3) lance-index::scalar::inverted BM25 FTS BM25 scoring inner loop
crates/bitpack candidate (A4) lance-encoding::encodings::bitpack Bitpack integer decode
crates/dictionary candidate (A5) lance-encoding::encodings::dictionary Dictionary decode
crates/fsst candidate (A6) lance-encoding::encodings::fsst FSST string decode
crates/take candidate (A7) lance-core::utils::take Take / gather kernel
crates/predicate candidate (A8) lance-datafusion filter eval Predicate evaluation kernels
crates/posting-intersect candidate (A9) lance-index::scalar::inverted Posting list intersection (FTS AND)
crates/topk-merge candidate (A10) scan-merge Top-K k-way merge

The candidate targets are documented in docs/targets/ and can be added by following docs/adding-a-target.md. The single landed target (pq-l2) proves the harness shape; the candidates wait for an agent to spin them up.

The contract every target follows

Karpathy's three-file shape, applied per target:

File (per target crate) Mutability Edited by
src/kernels.rs mutable the agent
src/reference.rs, src/inputs.rs, src/lib.rs, src/bin/run_experiment.rs, benches/*.rs immutable
program.md human-iterated the human, between runs
results.tsv append-only the agent, per trial (gitignored)

The shared utilities — deterministic PRNG, geomean, peak-RSS readback, tolerance constants, time-budget — live in crates/harness-common and are consumed by every target. There is intentionally no Target trait: decode-kernel signatures and distance-kernel signatures are different enough that a unifying trait would either bloat or require erased boxing. Each target is its own natural shape; the shared crate is plumbing only.

The shared loop conventions every target's program.md inherits live in HARNESS.md. Per-target priors and API specifics live in each target's own program.md.

Dataset-independent by design

Every other ANN benchmark you've seen is "compete on this fixed dataset" (SIFT1M, GIST1M, DEEP1B). That conflates two things: kernel correctness (the math) and kernel speed under one specific data distribution. An LLM agent given recall@K as the oracle has incentive to overfit to the dataset's quirks.

We split them, every target:

  • Correctness = bit-equivalent (max_abs_err ≤ 1e-4 for floats; bitwise for integer/byte kernels) match to a scalar reference, on diverse generated inputs. Mathematical equivalence; no dataset to overfit. Lossy techniques fail this gate.
  • Speed = geomean ns/operation across multiple shape × distribution combinations, with worst-case guard. A kernel that wins on one distribution and regresses on another fails to keep.

By construction, an "improvement" generalizes across distributions and shapes. There is no wget sift.tar.gz step; every target is fully self-contained.

Why a separate repo (and a workspace, not a single crate)

OmniGraph (the graph engine that motivated this) pins Lance at a released version and consumes its kernels via the public crate API. Improvements live one layer below: in Lance itself. A standalone repo with no OmniGraph dep keeps the optimization target pure (only the kernel changes), keeps the license clean for upstream contribution (dual MIT/Apache-2.0 → Apache-2.0 PRs to Lance), and keeps each agent's working set tiny.

Workspace not single-crate because per-target deps differ — FSST decode will want a different dependency set than PQ kernels — and the agent's edits to one target's kernels.rs must not collide with another's lib path. Each target is buildable, testable, and runnable in isolation: cd crates/<target> && cargo run --release --bin run_experiment.

Quick start

# Run the landed PQ L2 target's baseline.
cargo run --release --bin run_experiment -p pq-l2

# Or with Claude Code / Codex, working on one target:
cd crates/pq-l2
# Open in your agent of choice and prompt:
#   Hi, have a look at program.md and let's kick off a new experiment.

# Add a new target (see docs/adding-a-target.md):
cp -r crates/pq-l2 crates/pq-cosine
# ... edit Cargo.toml name, kernels.rs / reference.rs / inputs.rs / program.md

Repo layout

lance-autoresearch/
├── Cargo.toml                         # workspace root
├── README.md                          # you are here
├── HARNESS.md                         # shared loop contract every target inherits
├── LICENSE-MIT, LICENSE-APACHE        # dual-licensed (Apache compat for Lance PRs)
├── crates/
│   ├── harness-common/                # shared: SplitMix64, geomean, peak RSS, tolerance, time budget
│   │   └── src/{lib,prng,stats,sysinfo,tolerance}.rs
│   └── pq-l2/                         # landed target
│       ├── Cargo.toml
│       ├── program.md                 # this target's agent skill
│       ├── src/
│       │   ├── lib.rs                 # PqShape + module wiring (immutable)
│       │   ├── kernels.rs             # MUTABLE — agent's playground
│       │   ├── reference.rs           # IMMUTABLE — scalar reference, oracle helpers
│       │   ├── inputs.rs              # IMMUTABLE — diverse test-data generators
│       │   └── bin/run_experiment.rs  # IMMUTABLE — per-trial entry point
│       └── benches/pq_l2.rs           # criterion benchmark (immutable)
└── docs/
    ├── design.md                      # rationale for the workspace shape
    ├── adding-a-target.md             # workflow for spinning up a new target
    └── targets/
        └── pq-l2.md                   # capsule: upstream Lance pointers, oracle, status

Upstream contribution path

When a commit on any target clears the keep bar by a meaningful margin (≥10% geomean speedup with worst-case guard intact), the human reviews the diff, ports the technique against lance-format/lance HEAD, runs Lance's own test suite, and opens a PR. Because the workspace is dual MIT/Apache-2.0 licensed and each target's kernel is algorithmically modeled on Lance's existing path, the upstream PR inherits Apache-2.0 cleanly.

License

Dual-licensed under either of:

at your option.