# Authorization (Cedar policy) OmniGraph integrates AWS Cedar (`cedar-policy = 4.9`) for ABAC. ## Policy actions 1. `read` — query / snapshot / list branches & commits 2. `export` — NDJSON export 3. `change` — mutations 4. `schema_apply` — apply schema migrations 5. `branch_create` 6. `branch_delete` 7. `branch_merge` 8. `admin` — reserved for policy-management surfaces (hot reload, audit log, approvals). No call site today; see MR-724 for the reservation rationale. ## Scope kinds - `branch_scope` — applied to source branch (`read`, `export`, `change`) - `target_branch_scope` — applied to destination (`schema_apply`, branch ops, run ops) - `protected_branches` — named list with special rules; rule scopes are `any | protected | unprotected` ## Configuration `omnigraph.yaml`: ```yaml policy: file: ./policy.yaml # Cedar rules + groups tests: ./policy.tests.yaml # declarative test cases cli: actor: act-andrew # default actor for CLI direct-engine writes ``` Each rule must use exactly one of `branch_scope` or `target_branch_scope`. `cli.actor` is the default actor identity for CLI direct-engine writes when `policy.file` is configured. Override per-invocation with `--as ` (top-level flag) — `--as` wins, otherwise `cli.actor` is used, otherwise no actor. With policy configured and neither set, the engine-layer footgun guard intentionally denies the write (silent bypass via "I forgot the actor" is exactly what the guard prevents). Remote HTTP writes ignore both — they resolve their actor server-side from the bearer token. ## CLI - `omnigraph policy validate` — parse + count actors, exit 1 on parse error. - `omnigraph policy test` — run cases in `policy.tests.yaml`, exit 1 on any expectation mismatch. - `omnigraph policy explain --actor … --action … [--branch …] [--target-branch …]` — show decision and matched rule. - `omnigraph --as ` — set the actor for the duration of one invocation. Effective for `change`, `load`, `ingest`, `branch create|delete|merge`, and `schema apply` against local URIs. No-op against remote HTTP URIs (actor is bearer-token-resolved server-side). ## Enforcement Policy is a property of the **engine**, not the transport. Every mutating write — `mutate_as`, `load_as`, `ingest_as`, `apply_schema_as`, `branch_create_as`, `branch_create_from_as`, `branch_delete_as`, `branch_merge_as` — calls `Omnigraph::enforce(action, scope, actor)` at the head of the method. The gate fires identically whether the call originates from the HTTP server, the CLI, or an embedded SDK consumer. When no `PolicyChecker` is installed (the dev/embedded default) the gate is a strict no-op; when one is installed and the call site forgets to thread an actor through, the gate fails closed rather than silently bypassing. ## Server runtime states (MR-723) The HTTP server classifies its startup configuration into one of three states based on whether bearer tokens are configured and whether a policy file is set. The state determines what happens to a request that reaches `authorize_request()` without a matching policy permit. | State | Tokens | Policy file | Behavior | |---|---|---|---| | **Open** | no | no | Every request is permitted. Refuses to start unless `--unauthenticated` or `OMNIGRAPH_UNAUTHENTICATED=1` is set — the operator must explicitly opt in. | | **DefaultDeny** | yes | no | Every authenticated request for an action other than `read` is rejected with HTTP 403. Closes the "tokens but forgot the policy file" trap — an operator who sets up auth and forgot to point at a policy file used to ship the illusion of protection. | | **PolicyEnabled** | any | yes | Every request is evaluated by Cedar against the configured policy. | The classifier is `classify_server_runtime_state` in `crates/omnigraph-server/src/lib.rs`; it returns `Err` for the "no tokens, no policy, no flag" cell so the server refuses to start instead of silently shipping an open instance. Tests pin every cell of the matrix and the State-2 deny path. Server-side, `authorize_request()` still runs at the HTTP boundary — that's where actor identity is resolved from the bearer token and where admission control / per-actor rate limits live. Engine-layer enforcement is the **defense in depth** layer: it catches CLI direct-engine writes, embedded SDK consumers, and any future transport that hasn't (or won't) re-implement HTTP's authorize_request. Both layers consult the same Cedar policy via the same `PolicyChecker` trait, so decisions cannot disagree. ## Coarse vs. fine enforcement There are two enforcement points, each with non-overlapping responsibilities: | Layer | Question it answers | Where it fires | |---|---|---| | **Engine-layer (coarse)** | Can this actor invoke this action against this branch / branch-transition? | `Omnigraph::enforce(action, scope, actor)` at the head of every `_as` writer; one Cedar decision per call. | | **Query-layer (fine)** | For the rows / types this action actually touches, which can the actor see or modify? | Per-row predicates pushed into DataFusion at plan time. **Not yet implemented — see MR-725.** | The engine-layer gate keeps `ResourceScope` deliberately at branch granularity (`Graph`, `Branch`, `TargetBranch`, `BranchTransition`). Per-type and per-row authority is the query-layer's job; conflating them in `ResourceScope` would create two places per-type policy could be evaluated and a drift surface between them. ## Actor identity (signed-claim-only) The actor identity used for every policy decision comes from the matched bearer token — never from a client-supplied request header, query parameter, or body field. The server resolves the token at the auth middleware boundary, looks up the actor it was minted for, and overwrites whatever the handler may have placed in the policy request. Clients cannot set `actor_id` directly. This is intentional. Trusting client-supplied identity for authorization is "asking the attacker if they're an admin" — Supabase's RLS history names the same footgun. The chokepoint lives in `authorize_request` in `crates/omnigraph-server/src/lib.rs` and is named in `docs/dev/invariants.md` Hard Invariant 11. A regression test asserts the contract: a request with `Authorization: Bearer ` plus `X-Actor-Id: actor-B` always evaluates as actor A, never as actor B. If you find yourself wanting to let clients override `actor_id` for impersonation, delegation, or service-account flows — that's a feature, but it needs explicit design (e.g., signed delegation claims, an `On-Behalf-Of` audit trail). It is not a convenience knob.