Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
aaltshuler
a819ab500e feat(cli): keyed credentials — servers:, the token chain, login/logout (RFC-007 PR 2)
The operator config gains servers: (name -> url; never a token). A remote
command whose URL prefix-matches an operator server resolves its bearer
token through the keyed chain first — OMNIGRAPH_TOKEN_<NAME> env, then the
[<name>] section of ~/.omnigraph/credentials (created 0600 via temp+rename,
#139 finding 7; group/world-readable files refused loudly) — falling
through to the legacy chain unchanged. URL keying makes §D5 rule 3
structural: a token is only ever sent to the server it is keyed to.
Longest-prefix matching with a path-boundary check (http://h:8080 never
matches http://h:8080-evil). Inserting the keyed hop above the legacy chain
is safe by construction — no existing setup can have servers: defined.

omnigraph login <name> stores/rotates one section (token from --token or
one stdin line — the pipe flow keeps secrets out of shell history);
omnigraph logout removes it, idempotently; logging in before declaring the
server warns instead of failing (the gh model).

Coverage: URL-match/no-substring-trap, credentials round-trip preserving
sibling sections, 0600 write + over-permissive refusal, env-name mapping;
the legacy resolve test is now hermetic against a real ~/.omnigraph and
asserts byte-identical legacy behavior with no servers defined; one
spawned-binary e2e walks the whole lifecycle against an authed server:
refusal -> wrong-token login (stdin) -> rotate (--token) -> authorized read
-> env-beats-file -> non-matching-URL negative -> logout revokes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 21:24:51 +03:00
aaltshuler
08ce8dc34d docs(rfc): align RFC-007 with RFC-008's two-surface architecture
RFC-007 now speaks the end-state language throughout: the operator surface
is one half of the two-surface split (cluster config / operator config),
not a layer over a living omnigraph.yaml. The precedence cascade drops the
project layer (cluster config carries no operator-resolvable keys — a
checkout can never supply identity); legacy omnigraph.yaml appears only as
the RFC-008 deprecation-window slot. The trust boundary is restated as
closed-by-construction in the end state, with the rules governing the
window. PR 3 becomes operator targeting (--server + operator aliases — the
replacement RFC-008 needs before legacy aliases migrate), and the schema
example gains the aliases block.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 19:54:34 +03:00
aaltshuler
320311e759 docs(rfc): RFC-008 — deprecate omnigraph.yaml, one concern per config surface
The file is three unrelated concerns wearing one filename — server
deployment config, project/CLI conveniences, operator identity — and the
mixture is the root cause of a recurring problem class (per-operator
copies of project files, checkout-supplied credential redirection, init
scaffold pollution). End state: two single-owner surfaces — cluster
config (team, repo) and operator config (person, $HOME) — plus the
zero-config flags/env tier.

Complete key-by-key migration map over the verified OmnigraphConfig
surface; staged retirement per the repo's Hyrum rules (warn with per-key
guidance -> `config migrate` tool -> stop scaffolding -> opt-in strict ->
removal at the next major). RFC-007's project-layer framing is amended to
transitional accordingly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 19:33:19 +03:00
aaltshuler
d531f60999 docs(rfc): RFC-007 — per-operator config, the operator slice of RFC-002
Terraform-style operator/project split: ~/.omnigraph/config.yaml for
identity (operator.actor in the --as cascade), credentials keyed by
server name (env -> 0600 credentials file; no inline secrets), and
operator-owned named servers that project configs reference but cannot
redefine. Explicitly a staged subset of RFC-002: adopts its settled
decisions (one dir, keyed credentials, env precedence), defers
GraphLocator/use/state-layer, and encodes the ten confirmed PR #139
findings as design rules (compat shims, key-level merges, atomic writes,
the project-layer trust boundary).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 18:29:55 +03:00