chore(codeowners): remove aaltshuler as owner

.github/CODEOWNERS

@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@
 # CI fails if this file drifts from its source, and rejects PRs that
 # edit this file directly without also editing the yml.
 
-*             @aaltshuler @ragnorc
+*             @ragnorc
 
-crates/**     @aaltshuler @ragnorc
-docs/**       @aaltshuler @ragnorc
-README.md     @aaltshuler @ragnorc
-AGENTS.md     @aaltshuler @ragnorc
-CLAUDE.md     @aaltshuler @ragnorc
-SECURITY.md   @aaltshuler @ragnorc
+crates/**     @ragnorc
+docs/**       @ragnorc
+README.md     @ragnorc
+AGENTS.md     @ragnorc
+CLAUDE.md     @ragnorc
+SECURITY.md   @ragnorc

.github/codeowners-roles.yml

@@ -19,19 +19,15 @@ roles:
   engineering:
     description: >
       All production code under crates/**. Engine, CLI, server,
-      compiler. Either named member can approve.
+      compiler.
     members:
-      - aaltshuler
       - ragnorc
 
   docs:
     description: >
       Documentation under docs/**, plus repo-level docs (README.md,
-      AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md symlink, SECURITY.md). Either named member
-      can approve; both are listed so reviews can route to whoever is
-      available.
+      AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md symlink, SECURITY.md).
     members:
-      - aaltshuler
       - ragnorc
 
 # Path → role mapping. GitHub CODEOWNERS uses "last match wins"

docs/dev/codeowners.md

@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ This setup gives every role change a reviewable PR and a permanent in-repository
 
 | Role | Members | Scope |
 |---|---|---|
-| `engineering` | `@aaltshuler`, `@ragnorc` | All code under `crates/**`, repository infrastructure, default for unmapped paths |
-| `docs` | `@aaltshuler`, `@ragnorc` | `docs/**`, README.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, SECURITY.md |
+| `engineering` | `@ragnorc` | All code under `crates/**`, repository infrastructure, default for unmapped paths |
+| `docs` | `@ragnorc` | `docs/**`, README.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, SECURITY.md |
 
-GitHub treats multiple owners in a CODEOWNERS line as **"any one of them satisfies the review requirement"**. For docs, either named member can approve. To require N distinct approvers on a specific path, layer a CI check on top (not currently configured).
+GitHub treats multiple owners in a CODEOWNERS line as **"any one of them satisfies the review requirement"**. To require N distinct approvers on a specific path, layer a CI check on top (not currently configured).
 
 ## How to change role membership or path mappings