docs: rename runs.md/runs.rs → writes and repoint all references (#131)

The Run state machine was removed in MR-771 (v0.4.0); `docs/dev/runs.md`
and `crates/omnigraph/tests/runs.rs` have since documented and tested the
direct-publish write path, so the "runs" name was misleading.

- git mv docs/dev/runs.md → docs/dev/writes.md (reframe H1 + intro;
  keep MR-771 history note)
- git mv crates/omnigraph/tests/runs.rs → tests/writes.rs (reframe header)
- repoint every runs.md / runs.rs reference across docs, AGENTS.md, and
  source comments
- fix four pre-existing broken `docs/runs.md` links (the file never lived
  at that path) to `docs/dev/writes.md`
- fix the stale v0.4.0 anchor to the live section

No behavior change: every source edit is a comment. Engine builds and the
renamed test passes 25/25; scripts/check-agents-md.sh passes.

The run-removal cleanup itself (run_registry.rs guard, __run__ prefix) is
deferred to MR-770.

docs/dev/architecture.md

@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ contracts:
 This pattern realizes read-your-writes within a multi-statement mutation
 and keeps failure scope bounded for inserts/updates by construction at
 the writer layer. See [docs/dev/invariants.md](invariants.md) and
-[docs/dev/runs.md](runs.md) for the publisher CAS contract this builds on.
+[docs/dev/writes.md](writes.md) for the publisher CAS contract this builds on.
 
 ### Storage trait — today vs. roadmap
 
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ flowchart LR
     eng --> wq
 ```
 
-The server applies Cedar policy at the HTTP boundary today. The roadmap, called out in [docs/dev/invariants.md](invariants.md) as a known gap, is to push policy into the planner as predicates. After Cedar, mutating handlers go through `WorkloadController` (per-actor admission cap + byte budget; PR 2 / MR-686) before reaching the engine. The engine itself holds an `Arc<WriteQueueManager>` so concurrent mutations on the same `(table, branch)` serialize at the queue, while disjoint keys run in parallel — see [docs/user/server.md](../user/server.md) "Per-actor admission control" and [docs/dev/runs.md](runs.md). The CLI bypasses the HTTP layer (and admission) and calls the engine API directly.
+The server applies Cedar policy at the HTTP boundary today. The roadmap, called out in [docs/dev/invariants.md](invariants.md) as a known gap, is to push policy into the planner as predicates. After Cedar, mutating handlers go through `WorkloadController` (per-actor admission cap + byte budget; PR 2 / MR-686) before reaching the engine. The engine itself holds an `Arc<WriteQueueManager>` so concurrent mutations on the same `(table, branch)` serialize at the queue, while disjoint keys run in parallel — see [docs/user/server.md](../user/server.md) "Per-actor admission control" and [docs/dev/writes.md](writes.md). The CLI bypasses the HTTP layer (and admission) and calls the engine API directly.
 
 Code paths: