This commit is contained in:
Eli Peter 2026-06-05 10:16:30 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent 55247b7fcd
commit 991c84a1eb
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1464 changed files with 225448 additions and 1985 deletions

View file

@ -45,14 +45,14 @@
"notes": "Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command) with deserialized input; AST pattern correctly matches"
},
{
"rule_id": "java.xss.getwriter_print",
"rule_id": "taint-unsanitised-flow",
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"must_not_match": true,
"line_range": [
11,
11
],
"notes": "response.getWriter().println(\"Done\") — constant string, Layer B suppresses (regression guard)"
"notes": "response.getWriter().println(\"Done\") — constant string, must NOT raise reflected-XSS (Cap::HTML_ESCAPE). Regression guard retargeted from the retired java.xss.getwriter_print AST pattern to the taint sink that now owns reflected XSS."
},
{
"rule_id": "taint-unsanitised-flow",

View file

@ -80,14 +80,14 @@
"notes": "source at 11:9 (request.getParameter(\"input\")) flows through SQL query (line 17) into result set output at out.println(rs.getString(1)); second-order taint via tainted query results"
},
{
"rule_id": "java.xss.getwriter_print",
"rule_id": "taint-unsanitised-flow",
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"must_not_match": true,
"line_range": [
26,
26
],
"notes": "response.getWriter().println(new String(data)) — file-read data, Layer B suppresses (regression guard)"
"notes": "response.getWriter().println(new String(data)) — file-read bytes, not reflected request input, must NOT raise reflected-XSS (Cap::HTML_ESCAPE). Regression guard retargeted from the retired java.xss.getwriter_print AST pattern to the taint sink that now owns reflected XSS."
}
]
}

View file

@ -9,15 +9,7 @@
"must_match": true,
"line_range": [5, 12],
"evidence_contains": [],
"notes": "catch(Exception e) binds e as tainted; e flows to println sink via catch parameter"
},
{
"rule_id": "java.xss.getwriter_print",
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"must_match": true,
"line_range": [10, 10],
"evidence_contains": [],
"notes": "response.getWriter().println() in catch block — AST pattern detects potential XSS via error response"
"notes": "catch(Exception e) binds e as tainted; e flows to response.getWriter().println at line 10 — reflected XSS via error response. Replaces the retired java.xss.getwriter_print AST pattern: reflected XSS is now a taint sink (Sink(Cap::HTML_ESCAPE)), so this is taint-confirmed rather than flagged on every writer call."
}
]
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
{
"description": "Dead-branch constant condition (OWASP Benchmark cmdi non-vulnerable shape). `(7*42) - num > 200` with num=86 is 208 > 200 — always true — so `bar` is the constant string and the `else bar = param` arm is statically dead. The constant-branch fold (src/ssa/const_prop.rs::fold_constant_branches) evaluates the captured CondArith tree, prunes the dead edge, and drops the tainted phi operand AND neutralises the dead block so copy-prop cannot alias `bar`<->`param`. Result: `r.exec(cmd + bar)` carries no taint. Asserts NO taint finding fires (strict_unexpected promotes any taint-unsanitised-flow to a hard failure).",
"tags": [
"taint",
"cmdi",
"servlet",
"runtime",
"dead-branch",
"const-fold",
"precision"
],
"modes": [
"full"
],
"strict_unexpected": [
"taint-unsanitised-flow"
],
"expected": []
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
import java.io.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
// Dead-branch constant condition (OWASP Benchmark cmdi non-vulnerable shape).
// The guard `(7*42) - num > 200` is `294 - 86 = 208 > 200`, i.e. ALWAYS true,
// so `bar` is provably the constant string and the tainted `else` arm
// (`bar = param`) is unreachable. The constant-branch fold
// (`fold_constant_branches`) must prune the dead edge and drop the tainted
// phi operand so `r.exec(cmd + bar)` carries no attacker data NO finding.
public class DeadBranchConstSafe extends HttpServlet {
protected void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
throws IOException {
String param = request.getHeader("vector");
String bar;
int num = 86;
if ((7 * 42) - num > 200) {
bar = "This_should_always_happen";
} else {
bar = param;
}
String cmd = "echo ";
Runtime r = Runtime.getRuntime();
Process p = r.exec(cmd + bar);
}
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
{
"description": "Dead-branch constant condition with VULNERABLE polarity. `(500/42) + num > 200` is `11 + 196 = 207 > 200` (integer division) — always true — and the TRUE arm assigns the tainted `param`, so the reachable branch carries taint and only the `else bar = \"...\"` arm is dead. The constant-branch fold must prune the DEAD else edge while keeping the live `bar = param`, so the command-injection finding at `r.exec(cmd + bar)` MUST still fire. Zero-false-negative guard: it proves the fold never prunes the reachable (tainted) arm.",
"tags": [
"taint",
"cmdi",
"servlet",
"runtime",
"dead-branch",
"const-fold",
"no-false-negative"
],
"modes": [
"full"
],
"strict_unexpected": [
"taint-unsanitised-flow"
],
"expected": [
{
"rule_id": "taint-unsanitised-flow",
"severity": "HIGH",
"must_match": true,
"line_range": [
26,
26
],
"evidence_contains": [],
"notes": "request.getHeader (line 15) flows into bar on the always-taken true arm (line 21), then into r.exec at line 26. Exactly one finding survives.",
"max_count": 1
}
]
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
import java.io.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
// Dead-branch constant condition, VULNERABLE polarity (OWASP Benchmark cmdi
// vulnerable shape). The guard `(500/42) + num > 200` is `11 + 196 = 207 > 200`
// using integer division ALWAYS true and the TRUE arm assigns the tainted
// `param`. So the live branch carries taint and the `else bar = "never"` arm is
// dead. The constant-branch fold must prune the DEAD (else) edge and keep the
// reachable tainted `bar = param`, so `r.exec(cmd + bar)` MUST still fire. This
// is the zero-false-negative guard: the fold must never prune the live arm.
public class DeadBranchParamVuln extends HttpServlet {
protected void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
throws IOException {
String param = request.getHeader("vector");
String bar;
int num = 196;
if ((500 / 42) + num > 200) {
bar = param;
} else {
bar = "This_should_never_happen";
}
String cmd = "echo ";
Runtime r = Runtime.getRuntime();
Process p = r.exec(cmd + bar);
}
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
{
"description": "HttpServletRequest parameter flows through a List into ProcessBuilder.command(argList) — command injection via the setter form (list attached separately from the constructor, then pb.start()). This is the dominant OWASP Benchmark cmdi shape; resolved via type-qualified ProcessBuilder.command sink on the typed receiver plus container-element taint on the argument list.",
"tags": [
"taint",
"cmdi",
"servlet",
"container"
],
"modes": [
"full"
],
"strict_unexpected": [
"taint-unsanitised-flow"
],
"expected": [
{
"rule_id": "taint-unsanitised-flow",
"severity": "HIGH",
"must_match": true,
"line_range": [
16,
16
],
"evidence_contains": [],
"notes": "request.getParameter (line 8) is concatenated into a list element (argList.add at line 13), the list is attached to ProcessBuilder via pb.command(argList) at line 16, and executed by pb.start() at line 17. The type-qualified ProcessBuilder.command sink fires at line 16 on the tainted container argument. Exactly one finding survives.",
"max_count": 1
}
]
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
import java.io.*;
import java.util.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
public class ProcessCommandHandler extends HttpServlet {
protected void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
throws IOException {
String param = request.getParameter("vector");
List<String> argList = new ArrayList<String>();
argList.add("sh");
argList.add("-c");
argList.add("echo " + param);
ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder();
pb.command(argList);
pb.start();
}
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"description": "HttpServletRequest header flows into a String[] env array passed to a split-receiver Runtime.exec — command injection via the `Runtime r = Runtime.getRuntime(); ... r.exec(cmd, argsEnv)` shape (the dominant remaining OWASP Benchmark cmdi form). The callee text at the sink is `r.exec`, which does not suffix-match the flat `Runtime.exec` rule; resolution depends on the receiver `r` carrying TypeKind::Runtime (from the `Runtime.getRuntime()` factory / the `Runtime` declared type) so the type-qualified resolver rewrites `r.exec` → `Runtime.exec`. Taint is in the env array (arg 1), so no payload-arg restriction may be applied.",
"tags": [
"taint",
"cmdi",
"servlet",
"runtime",
"split-receiver"
],
"modes": [
"full"
],
"strict_unexpected": [
"taint-unsanitised-flow"
],
"expected": [
{
"rule_id": "taint-unsanitised-flow",
"severity": "HIGH",
"must_match": true,
"line_range": [
16,
16
],
"evidence_contains": [],
"notes": "request.getHeader (line 7) flows into the env array element argsEnv (line 15), which is passed as arg 1 of r.exec at line 16. The receiver r is typed Runtime via Runtime.getRuntime() (line 13), so the type-qualified Runtime.exec sink fires at the split-receiver call. Exactly one finding survives.",
"max_count": 1
}
]
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
import java.io.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
public class RuntimeSplitReceiverHandler extends HttpServlet {
protected void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
throws IOException {
String param = request.getHeader("vector");
// Split-receiver Runtime.exec: the receiver is bound to a local in
// one statement, then exec is called on it in another. The OWASP
// Benchmark cmdi shape places the tainted data in the environment
// array (arg 1), not the command (arg 0).
Runtime r = Runtime.getRuntime();
String[] args = { "/bin/sh", "-c", "echo nyx" };
String[] argsEnv = { "TAINT=" + param };
r.exec(args, argsEnv);
}
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
{
"description": "Constant-condition ternary (OWASP Benchmark cmdi non-vulnerable shape). `(7*18) + num > 200` with num=106 is 232 > 200 — always true — so `bar` is the constant string and the `: param` arm is statically dead. Extending the ternary-RHS diamond split to Java (src/cfg/mod.rs) routes `bar = cond ? const : param` through a real branch+phi CFG; build_ternary_diamond stamps the CondArith tree so fold_constant_branches prunes the dead tainted arm and neutralises its block, exactly as the if-form does. Result: `r.exec(cmd + bar)` carries no taint. Asserts NO taint finding fires.",
"tags": [
"taint",
"cmdi",
"servlet",
"runtime",
"ternary",
"const-fold",
"precision"
],
"modes": [
"full"
],
"strict_unexpected": [
"taint-unsanitised-flow"
],
"expected": []
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
import java.io.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
// Constant-condition ternary (OWASP Benchmark cmdi non-vulnerable shape).
// `(7*18) + num` is `126 + 106 = 232 > 200` ALWAYS true so `bar` is the
// constant string and the `: param` arm is statically dead. Routing the Java
// ternary through the branch+phi diamond lets `fold_constant_branches` prune
// the dead tainted arm exactly as it does for the if-form NO finding.
public class TernaryConstSafe extends HttpServlet {
protected void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
throws IOException {
String param = request.getHeader("vector");
int num = 106;
String bar = (7 * 18) + num > 200 ? "This_should_always_happen" : param;
String cmd = "echo ";
Runtime r = Runtime.getRuntime();
Process p = r.exec(cmd + bar);
}
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
{
"description": "Constant-condition ternary with VULNERABLE polarity. `(500/42) + num > 200` is `11 + 196 = 207 > 200` (integer division) — always true — and the TRUE arm assigns the tainted `param`, so the reachable arm carries taint and only the `: \"...\"` const arm is dead. The Java ternary diamond split + fold must prune the DEAD const arm while keeping the live `bar = param`, so the command-injection finding at `r.exec(cmd + bar)` MUST still fire. Zero-false-negative guard: proves the diamond/fold never prunes the reachable tainted arm.",
"tags": [
"taint",
"cmdi",
"servlet",
"runtime",
"ternary",
"const-fold",
"no-false-negative"
],
"modes": [
"full"
],
"strict_unexpected": [
"taint-unsanitised-flow"
],
"expected": [
{
"rule_id": "taint-unsanitised-flow",
"severity": "HIGH",
"must_match": true,
"line_range": [
19,
19
],
"evidence_contains": [],
"notes": "request.getHeader (line 12) flows into bar on the always-taken true arm (line 15), then into r.exec at line 19. Exactly one finding survives.",
"max_count": 1
}
]
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
import java.io.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
// Constant-condition ternary, VULNERABLE polarity. `(500/42) + num` is
// `11 + 196 = 207 > 200` (integer division) ALWAYS true and the TRUE arm
// selects the tainted `param`, so the reachable arm carries taint and only the
// `: "..."` const arm is dead. The fold must prune the dead const arm while
// keeping the live `param`, so the cmdi finding at `r.exec` MUST still fire.
public class TernaryParamVuln extends HttpServlet {
protected void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
throws IOException {
String param = request.getHeader("vector");
int num = 196;
String bar = (500 / 42) + num > 200 ? param : "This_should_never_happen";
String cmd = "echo ";
Runtime r = Runtime.getRuntime();
Process p = r.exec(cmd + bar);
}
}

View file

@ -19,21 +19,13 @@
"evidence_contains": [],
"notes": "AST pattern detects executeQuery with string concatenation — SQL injection"
},
{
"rule_id": "java.xss.getwriter_print",
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"must_match": true,
"line_range": [12, 12],
"evidence_contains": [],
"notes": "response.getWriter().println() with user input — reflected XSS via error response"
},
{
"rule_id": "taint-unsanitised-flow",
"severity": "HIGH",
"must_match": true,
"line_range": [7, 12],
"evidence_contains": [],
"notes": "request.getParameter flows to response.getWriter().println — user input reflected in error response"
"notes": "request.getParameter flows to response.getWriter().println at line 12 — user input reflected in error response. Replaces the retired java.xss.getwriter_print AST pattern: reflected XSS is now a taint sink (Sink(Cap::HTML_ESCAPE)), taint-confirmed rather than flagged on every writer call."
}
]
}