mirror of
https://github.com/elicpeter/nyx.git
synced 2026-06-21 20:18:06 +02:00
[pitboss] phase 01: Track A.1 — Spec derivation strategy enum + flow-steps-optional fallback
This commit is contained in:
parent
5909fa8c5d
commit
31d9ef725a
21 changed files with 1106 additions and 62 deletions
|
|
@ -28,6 +28,42 @@
|
|||
//!
|
||||
//! Off by default. Enable with `--features dynamic`. Heavy deps (container
|
||||
//! runtime client, fuzzer harness) live behind the same gate.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! # Spec derivation strategies
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! [`spec::HarnessSpec::from_finding_opts`] tries a fixed-order pipeline of
|
||||
//! [`spec::SpecDerivationStrategy`] candidates and returns the first one that
|
||||
//! produces a runnable spec. Ordering is deliberately chosen so the cheapest,
|
||||
//! most-precise sources fire first:
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 1. [`SpecDerivationStrategy::FromFlowSteps`] — the original derivation
|
||||
//! path. Walks `evidence.flow_steps` for the outermost `Source` and uses
|
||||
//! its enclosing function as the entry. Fires for taint findings with a
|
||||
//! real cross-function flow.
|
||||
//! 2. [`SpecDerivationStrategy::FromRuleNamespace`] — consumes the diag's
|
||||
//! rule id (`py.cmdi.os_system`, `java.deser.readobject`,
|
||||
//! `rs.auth.missing_ownership_check.taint`) plus `evidence.sink_caps` to
|
||||
//! synthesize a single-step flow. Fires for AST/CFG findings whose rule
|
||||
//! namespace identifies the sink class.
|
||||
//! 3. [`SpecDerivationStrategy::FromFuncSummaryWalk`] — walks a
|
||||
//! [`crate::summary::FuncSummary`] for the sink's enclosing function and
|
||||
//! picks a `tainted_sink_params` entry. Currently only fires when a
|
||||
//! summary is threaded in by the caller; the default verifier path does
|
||||
//! not.
|
||||
//! 4. [`SpecDerivationStrategy::FromCallgraphEntry`] — last-chance heuristic
|
||||
//! that treats `*.http.*` and `*.cli.*` rule ids as entry-point findings.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! When every strategy returns `None`, [`verify::verify_finding`] decides
|
||||
//! whether to lift the failure to
|
||||
//! [`crate::evidence::InconclusiveReason::SpecDerivationFailed`] (the finding
|
||||
//! had derivable signal but no strategy matched) or to keep it as
|
||||
//! [`crate::evidence::UnsupportedReason::SpecDerivationFailed`] (genuinely
|
||||
//! unmodellable).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! [`SpecDerivationStrategy::FromFlowSteps`]: spec::SpecDerivationStrategy::FromFlowSteps
|
||||
//! [`SpecDerivationStrategy::FromRuleNamespace`]: spec::SpecDerivationStrategy::FromRuleNamespace
|
||||
//! [`SpecDerivationStrategy::FromFuncSummaryWalk`]: spec::SpecDerivationStrategy::FromFuncSummaryWalk
|
||||
//! [`SpecDerivationStrategy::FromCallgraphEntry`]: spec::SpecDerivationStrategy::FromCallgraphEntry
|
||||
|
||||
pub mod build_sandbox;
|
||||
pub mod corpus;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue