diff --git a/frontend/src/pages/FindingDetailPage.tsx b/frontend/src/pages/FindingDetailPage.tsx
index bc8a3a50..786a62be 100644
--- a/frontend/src/pages/FindingDetailPage.tsx
+++ b/frontend/src/pages/FindingDetailPage.tsx
@@ -705,10 +705,12 @@ function HowToFix({ finding }: { finding: FindingView }) {
 
 // ── Dynamic Verification Panel ──────────────────────────────────────────────
 
-function DynamicVerdictSection({ verdict }: { verdict: VerifyResult }) {
+export function DynamicVerdictSection({ verdict }: { verdict: VerifyResult }) {
   const [copied, setCopied] = useState(false);
-  const reproPath = `~/.cache/nyx/dynamic/repro/${verdict.finding_id}/`;
-  const reproCmd = './reproduce.sh';
+  // The repro bundle is keyed by spec_hash (not finding_id) inside the Nyx
+  // cache.  Rather than showing a path that may not match, surface the CLI
+  // command that locates and opens the bundle regardless of the hash.
+  const reproCmd = `nyx repro --finding ${verdict.finding_id}`;
 
   const copyCmd = () => {
     navigator.clipboard.writeText(reproCmd).then(() => {
@@ -733,11 +735,8 @@ function DynamicVerdictSection({ verdict }: { verdict: VerifyResult }) {
 
       {verdict.status === 'Confirmed' && (
         <div className="repro-panel" data-testid="repro-panel">
-          <div className="repro-path-row">
-            <span className="repro-label">Repro artifact:</span>
-            <code className="repro-path">{reproPath}</code>
-          </div>
           <div className="repro-cmd-row">
+            <span className="repro-label">Reproduce:</span>
             <code className="repro-cmd">{reproCmd}</code>
             <button
               type="button"
diff --git a/frontend/src/test/components/dynamicVerdictSection.test.tsx b/frontend/src/test/components/dynamicVerdictSection.test.tsx
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..26758288
--- /dev/null
+++ b/frontend/src/test/components/dynamicVerdictSection.test.tsx
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest';
+import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
+import { DynamicVerdictSection } from '@/pages/FindingDetailPage';
+import type { VerifyResult } from '@/api/types';
+
+function makeVerdict(
+  status: VerifyResult['status'],
+  extras: Partial<VerifyResult> = {},
+): VerifyResult {
+  return {
+    finding_id: 'test-finding-id-abc',
+    status,
+    attempts: [],
+    ...extras,
+  };
+}
+
+// Mock navigator.clipboard before each test.
+beforeEach(() => {
+  Object.defineProperty(navigator, 'clipboard', {
+    value: { writeText: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined) },
+    configurable: true,
+    writable: true,
+  });
+});
+
+describe('DynamicVerdictSection', () => {
+  it('renders Confirmed badge', () => {
+    render(
+      <DynamicVerdictSection
+        verdict={makeVerdict('Confirmed', { triggered_payload: 'sqli-tautology' })}
+      />,
+    );
+    expect(screen.getByTestId('verdict-badge-confirmed')).toBeInTheDocument();
+  });
+
+  it('renders NotConfirmed badge', () => {
+    render(<DynamicVerdictSection verdict={makeVerdict('NotConfirmed')} />);
+    expect(screen.getByTestId('verdict-badge-notconfirmed')).toBeInTheDocument();
+  });
+
+  it('renders Unsupported badge', () => {
+    render(
+      <DynamicVerdictSection
+        verdict={makeVerdict('Unsupported', { reason: 'NoPayloadsForCap' })}
+      />,
+    );
+    expect(screen.getByTestId('verdict-badge-unsupported')).toBeInTheDocument();
+  });
+
+  it('renders Inconclusive badge', () => {
+    render(
+      <DynamicVerdictSection
+        verdict={makeVerdict('Inconclusive', { inconclusive_reason: 'BuildFailed' })}
+      />,
+    );
+    expect(screen.getByTestId('verdict-badge-inconclusive')).toBeInTheDocument();
+  });
+
+  it('shows repro panel only for Confirmed status', () => {
+    const { unmount } = render(
+      <DynamicVerdictSection verdict={makeVerdict('Confirmed')} />,
+    );
+    expect(screen.getByTestId('repro-panel')).toBeInTheDocument();
+    unmount();
+
+    for (const status of ['NotConfirmed', 'Unsupported', 'Inconclusive'] as const) {
+      const { unmount: u } = render(
+        <DynamicVerdictSection verdict={makeVerdict(status)} />,
+      );
+      expect(screen.queryByTestId('repro-panel')).toBeNull();
+      u();
+    }
+  });
+
+  it('repro-panel contains the finding_id in the CLI command', () => {
+    render(
+      <DynamicVerdictSection
+        verdict={makeVerdict('Confirmed', { finding_id: 'cafecafe12345678' })}
+      />,
+    );
+    const panel = screen.getByTestId('repro-panel');
+    expect(panel.textContent).toContain('cafecafe12345678');
+    expect(panel.textContent).toContain('nyx repro');
+  });
+
+  it('Copy button triggers clipboard writeText with the repro command', async () => {
+    const findingId = 'test-finding-id-abc';
+    render(<DynamicVerdictSection verdict={makeVerdict('Confirmed')} />);
+
+    const copyBtn = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /copy/i });
+    fireEvent.click(copyBtn);
+
+    expect(navigator.clipboard.writeText).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
+    const calledWith = (navigator.clipboard.writeText as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>).mock
+      .calls[0][0] as string;
+    expect(calledWith).toContain(findingId);
+    expect(calledWith).toContain('nyx repro');
+  });
+
+  it('shows exact toolchain match label when toolchain_match is exact', () => {
+    render(
+      <DynamicVerdictSection
+        verdict={makeVerdict('Confirmed', { toolchain_match: 'exact' })}
+      />,
+    );
+    expect(screen.getByText('exact toolchain')).toBeInTheDocument();
+  });
+
+  it('shows approximate toolchain match label when toolchain_match is drift', () => {
+    render(
+      <DynamicVerdictSection
+        verdict={makeVerdict('Confirmed', { toolchain_match: 'drift' })}
+      />,
+    );
+    expect(screen.getByText('approximate toolchain')).toBeInTheDocument();
+  });
+});
diff --git a/src/dynamic/telemetry.rs b/src/dynamic/telemetry.rs
index fa3ddb40..f6c329d1 100644
--- a/src/dynamic/telemetry.rs
+++ b/src/dynamic/telemetry.rs
@@ -118,6 +118,57 @@ pub fn log_path() -> Option<std::path::PathBuf> {
     events_log_path()
 }
 
+// ── Rank delta telemetry ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/// One telemetry event per ranked finding that carries a dynamic verdict delta.
+///
+/// Emitted by `rank::rank_diags` for every diag whose dynamic verdict shifts
+/// its rank score (delta != 0). Used by the M7 calibration pipeline to tune
+/// the N/M boost/penalty constants from real-world verdict distributions.
+#[derive(Debug, serde::Serialize)]
+pub struct RankDeltaEvent {
+    pub ts: String,
+    /// Always `"rank_delta"` — distinguishes from verdict events in the log.
+    pub event_type: &'static str,
+    pub finding_id: String,
+    /// `"Confirmed"`, `"NotConfirmed"`, etc.
+    pub status: String,
+    /// Signed delta applied to the rank score (+N for Confirmed, -M for NotConfirmed).
+    pub delta: f64,
+}
+
+/// Write a rank-delta telemetry event to the events log.
+///
+/// Silently no-ops under the same conditions as [`emit`]:
+/// `NYX_NO_TELEMETRY=1`, unresolvable log dir, or write failure.
+pub fn emit_rank_delta(event: RankDeltaEvent) {
+    if std::env::var("NYX_NO_TELEMETRY").as_deref() == Ok("1") {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    let Some(path) = events_log_path() else {
+        return;
+    };
+
+    let Ok(line) = serde_json::to_string(&event) else {
+        return;
+    };
+
+    let _ = (|| -> std::io::Result<()> {
+        if let Some(parent) = path.parent() {
+            fs::create_dir_all(parent)?;
+            #[cfg(unix)]
+            {
+                use std::os::unix::fs::PermissionsExt;
+                fs::set_permissions(parent, fs::Permissions::from_mode(0o700))?;
+            }
+        }
+        let mut f = OpenOptions::new().create(true).append(true).open(&path)?;
+        writeln!(f, "{line}")?;
+        Ok(())
+    })();
+}
+
 #[cfg(test)]
 mod tests {
     use super::*;
diff --git a/src/rank.rs b/src/rank.rs
index 592da6af..ba93aa57 100644
--- a/src/rank.rs
+++ b/src/rank.rs
@@ -206,6 +206,27 @@ pub fn rank_diags(diags: &mut [Diag]) {
         if !rank.components.is_empty() {
             d.rank_reason = Some(rank.components.clone());
         }
+        // Emit rank-delta telemetry for M7 calibration (§21 / deferred M7 hook).
+        // Only fires when the dynamic verdict shifted the score; benign verdicts
+        // (Unsupported, Inconclusive, no verdict) produce delta = None and are
+        // skipped — emitting them would add noise without calibration value.
+        #[cfg(feature = "dynamic")]
+        if let Some(delta) = dynamic_verdict_delta(d) {
+            use crate::dynamic::telemetry::{self, RankDeltaEvent};
+            let status = d
+                .evidence
+                .as_ref()
+                .and_then(|ev| ev.dynamic_verdict.as_ref())
+                .map(|dv| format!("{:?}", dv.status))
+                .unwrap_or_default();
+            telemetry::emit_rank_delta(RankDeltaEvent {
+                ts: chrono::Utc::now().to_rfc3339(),
+                event_type: "rank_delta",
+                finding_id: d.finding_id.clone(),
+                status,
+                delta,
+            });
+        }
     }
     diags.sort_by(|a, b| {
         let sa = a.rank_score.unwrap_or(0.0);
@@ -225,6 +246,15 @@ pub fn rank_diags(diags: &mut [Diag]) {
 /// Returns `None` when there is no verdict (static-only scan) or the verdict
 /// does not change the score (Unsupported, Inconclusive).
 ///
+/// Design note (§deferred M7 payload_corpus_complete): the spec originally
+/// distinguished `NotConfirmed` + `payload_corpus_complete == true` → `-M`
+/// from `NotConfirmed` + `NoPayloadsForCap` → no change.  In practice the
+/// `NoPayloadsForCap` path always produces `Unsupported`, never `NotConfirmed`,
+/// so the two cases are already disjoint in the type.  The heuristic
+/// `!dv.attempts.is_empty()` (corpus was actually tried) is equivalent to
+/// `payload_corpus_complete == true` for all reachable states — no extra
+/// field is needed.  See also §deferred decision in `.pitboss/play/deferred.md`.
+///
 /// TODO(M7): N=20 and M=5 are placeholders; calibrate from telemetry.
 fn dynamic_verdict_delta(diag: &Diag) -> Option<f64> {
     use crate::evidence::VerifyStatus;
@@ -234,7 +264,8 @@ fn dynamic_verdict_delta(diag: &Diag) -> Option<f64> {
         // Apply penalty only when the corpus was actually exhausted (attempts
         // were made); a NotConfirmed with zero attempts means something went
         // wrong before payload execution, which is an Inconclusive path, not
-        // a meaningful negative signal.
+        // a meaningful negative signal.  This is equivalent to the spec's
+        // `payload_corpus_complete == true` condition (see design note above).
         VerifyStatus::NotConfirmed if !dv.attempts.is_empty() => Some(-5.0),
         _ => None,
     }
@@ -1083,4 +1114,269 @@ mod tests {
             "Bail ({s_bail}) must rank at or below UnderReport ({s_under})"
         );
     }
+
+    // ── Dynamic verdict delta tests ────────────────────────────────────────
+
+    use crate::evidence::{AttemptSummary, Evidence, VerifyResult, VerifyStatus};
+
+    fn make_diag_with_verdict(verdict: Option<VerifyResult>) -> Diag {
+        let mut d = make_diag(
+            Severity::High,
+            "taint-unsanitised-flow (source 1:1)",
+            "src/main.rs",
+            10,
+            vec![("Source".into(), "stdin at 1:1".into())],
+            false,
+        );
+        d.finding_id = "test_finding_id".into();
+        if let Some(v) = verdict {
+            d.evidence = Some(Evidence {
+                dynamic_verdict: Some(v),
+                ..Default::default()
+            });
+        }
+        d
+    }
+
+    fn confirmed_verdict() -> VerifyResult {
+        VerifyResult {
+            finding_id: "test_finding_id".into(),
+            status: VerifyStatus::Confirmed,
+            triggered_payload: Some("sqli-tautology".into()),
+            reason: None,
+            inconclusive_reason: None,
+            detail: None,
+            attempts: vec![AttemptSummary {
+                payload_label: "sqli-tautology".into(),
+                exit_code: Some(0),
+                timed_out: false,
+                triggered: true,
+                sink_hit: true,
+            }],
+            toolchain_match: Some("exact".into()),
+        }
+    }
+
+    fn not_confirmed_with_attempts() -> VerifyResult {
+        VerifyResult {
+            finding_id: "test_finding_id".into(),
+            status: VerifyStatus::NotConfirmed,
+            triggered_payload: None,
+            reason: None,
+            inconclusive_reason: None,
+            detail: None,
+            attempts: vec![AttemptSummary {
+                payload_label: "sqli-tautology".into(),
+                exit_code: Some(0),
+                timed_out: false,
+                triggered: false,
+                sink_hit: false,
+            }],
+            toolchain_match: Some("exact".into()),
+        }
+    }
+
+    fn not_confirmed_no_attempts() -> VerifyResult {
+        VerifyResult {
+            finding_id: "test_finding_id".into(),
+            status: VerifyStatus::NotConfirmed,
+            triggered_payload: None,
+            reason: None,
+            inconclusive_reason: None,
+            detail: None,
+            attempts: vec![],
+            toolchain_match: None,
+        }
+    }
+
+    fn unsupported_verdict() -> VerifyResult {
+        VerifyResult {
+            finding_id: "test_finding_id".into(),
+            status: VerifyStatus::Unsupported,
+            triggered_payload: None,
+            reason: Some(crate::evidence::UnsupportedReason::NoPayloadsForCap),
+            inconclusive_reason: None,
+            detail: None,
+            attempts: vec![],
+            toolchain_match: None,
+        }
+    }
+
+    fn inconclusive_verdict() -> VerifyResult {
+        VerifyResult {
+            finding_id: "test_finding_id".into(),
+            status: VerifyStatus::Inconclusive,
+            triggered_payload: None,
+            reason: None,
+            inconclusive_reason: Some(crate::evidence::InconclusiveReason::BuildFailed),
+            detail: None,
+            attempts: vec![],
+            toolchain_match: None,
+        }
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_confirmed_delta_is_positive() {
+        let d = make_diag_with_verdict(Some(confirmed_verdict()));
+        assert_eq!(
+            dynamic_verdict_delta(&d),
+            Some(20.0),
+            "Confirmed must produce +20 delta"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_not_confirmed_with_attempts_delta_is_negative() {
+        let d = make_diag_with_verdict(Some(not_confirmed_with_attempts()));
+        assert_eq!(
+            dynamic_verdict_delta(&d),
+            Some(-5.0),
+            "NotConfirmed with attempts must produce -5 delta"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_not_confirmed_no_attempts_no_delta() {
+        let d = make_diag_with_verdict(Some(not_confirmed_no_attempts()));
+        assert_eq!(
+            dynamic_verdict_delta(&d),
+            None,
+            "NotConfirmed with zero attempts must produce no delta"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_unsupported_no_delta() {
+        let d = make_diag_with_verdict(Some(unsupported_verdict()));
+        assert_eq!(
+            dynamic_verdict_delta(&d),
+            None,
+            "Unsupported must produce no delta"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_inconclusive_no_delta() {
+        let d = make_diag_with_verdict(Some(inconclusive_verdict()));
+        assert_eq!(
+            dynamic_verdict_delta(&d),
+            None,
+            "Inconclusive must produce no delta"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_no_verdict_no_delta() {
+        let d = make_diag_with_verdict(None);
+        assert_eq!(
+            dynamic_verdict_delta(&d),
+            None,
+            "No verdict must produce no delta"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_confirmed_ranks_above_no_verdict() {
+        let confirmed = make_diag_with_verdict(Some(confirmed_verdict()));
+        let no_verdict = make_diag_with_verdict(None);
+
+        let s_confirmed = compute_attack_rank(&confirmed).score;
+        let s_none = compute_attack_rank(&no_verdict).score;
+        assert!(
+            s_confirmed > s_none,
+            "Confirmed ({s_confirmed}) must rank above no-verdict ({s_none})"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_no_verdict_ranks_above_not_confirmed_with_attempts() {
+        let no_verdict = make_diag_with_verdict(None);
+        let not_confirmed = make_diag_with_verdict(Some(not_confirmed_with_attempts()));
+
+        let s_none = compute_attack_rank(&no_verdict).score;
+        let s_nc = compute_attack_rank(&not_confirmed).score;
+        assert!(
+            s_none > s_nc,
+            "No-verdict ({s_none}) must rank above NotConfirmed-with-attempts ({s_nc})"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_unsupported_same_as_no_verdict() {
+        let no_verdict = make_diag_with_verdict(None);
+        let unsupported = make_diag_with_verdict(Some(unsupported_verdict()));
+
+        let s_none = compute_attack_rank(&no_verdict).score;
+        let s_uns = compute_attack_rank(&unsupported).score;
+        // Unsupported carries a 4-field Evidence struct so evidence_strength
+        // differs slightly from a None evidence diag.  What matters is that
+        // the *delta component* is zero — both deltas must agree.
+        assert_eq!(
+            dynamic_verdict_delta(&no_verdict),
+            dynamic_verdict_delta(&unsupported),
+            "Unsupported and no-verdict must both produce None delta"
+        );
+        // Same base inputs → scores differ only by evidence_strength bonus
+        // from the Evidence wrapper.  Verify no "dynamic_verdict" component
+        // in rank_reason.
+        let rank = compute_attack_rank(&unsupported);
+        assert!(
+            !rank.components.iter().any(|(k, _)| k == "dynamic_verdict"),
+            "Unsupported must not appear in rank_reason components"
+        );
+        let _ = s_none;
+        let _ = s_uns;
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_inconclusive_same_delta_as_no_verdict() {
+        let no_verdict = make_diag_with_verdict(None);
+        let inconclusive = make_diag_with_verdict(Some(inconclusive_verdict()));
+
+        assert_eq!(
+            dynamic_verdict_delta(&no_verdict),
+            dynamic_verdict_delta(&inconclusive),
+            "Inconclusive and no-verdict must both produce None delta"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_confirmed_rank_reason_contains_component() {
+        let d = make_diag_with_verdict(Some(confirmed_verdict()));
+        let rank = compute_attack_rank(&d);
+        assert!(
+            rank.components.iter().any(|(k, _)| k == "dynamic_verdict"),
+            "Confirmed verdict must appear in rank_reason components"
+        );
+        let dv_component = rank
+            .components
+            .iter()
+            .find(|(k, _)| k == "dynamic_verdict")
+            .unwrap();
+        assert!(
+            dv_component.1.starts_with('+'),
+            "Confirmed delta must be positive in rank_reason: {:?}",
+            dv_component.1
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn dynamic_verdict_not_confirmed_rank_reason_contains_negative_component() {
+        let d = make_diag_with_verdict(Some(not_confirmed_with_attempts()));
+        let rank = compute_attack_rank(&d);
+        assert!(
+            rank.components.iter().any(|(k, _)| k == "dynamic_verdict"),
+            "NotConfirmed-with-attempts must appear in rank_reason components"
+        );
+        let dv_component = rank
+            .components
+            .iter()
+            .find(|(k, _)| k == "dynamic_verdict")
+            .unwrap();
+        assert!(
+            dv_component.1.starts_with('-'),
+            "NotConfirmed delta must be negative in rank_reason: {:?}",
+            dv_component.1
+        );
+    }
 }
diff --git a/tests/dynamic_layering.rs b/tests/dynamic_layering.rs
index c9bc773e..f065b494 100644
--- a/tests/dynamic_layering.rs
+++ b/tests/dynamic_layering.rs
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 //! | `src/commands/scan.rs`       | enrichment loop lives here                |
 //! | `src/commands/mod.rs`        | `verify-feedback` subcommand (§21.2)      |
 //! | `src/server/` (any file)     | server start_scan verify wiring           |
+//! | `src/rank.rs`                | M7 rank-delta telemetry hook (§21 / M7)   |
 
 use std::fs;
 use std::path::{Path, PathBuf};
@@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ const ALLOWED: &[&str] = &[
     "commands/scan.rs",
     "commands/mod.rs",
     "server/",
+    "rank.rs",
     // The dynamic module itself is obviously allowed.
     "dynamic/",
 ];
diff --git a/tests/sarif_dynamic_verdict_tests.rs b/tests/sarif_dynamic_verdict_tests.rs
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a5649d02
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/sarif_dynamic_verdict_tests.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+//! SARIF output tests for the dynamic verification vendor extension (§5.4).
+//!
+//! Acceptance criterion: SARIF output contains both
+//! `partialFingerprints.dynamic_verdict_status` and
+//! `properties.nyx_dynamic_verdict` for every `VerifyStatus` variant, and
+//! both keys are absent when no dynamic verdict is attached.
+
+use nyx_scanner::commands::scan::Diag;
+use nyx_scanner::evidence::{
+    AttemptSummary, Evidence, InconclusiveReason, UnsupportedReason, VerifyResult, VerifyStatus,
+};
+use nyx_scanner::output::build_sarif;
+use nyx_scanner::patterns::{FindingCategory, Severity};
+use std::path::Path;
+
+fn base_diag() -> Diag {
+    Diag {
+        path: "/scan_root/src/main.rs".into(),
+        line: 10,
+        col: 5,
+        severity: Severity::High,
+        id: "taint-unsanitised-flow".into(),
+        category: FindingCategory::Security,
+        path_validated: false,
+        guard_kind: None,
+        message: None,
+        labels: vec![],
+        confidence: None,
+        evidence: None,
+        rank_score: None,
+        rank_reason: None,
+        suppressed: false,
+        suppression: None,
+        rollup: None,
+        finding_id: "deadbeef01234567".into(),
+        alternative_finding_ids: Vec::new(),
+        stable_hash: 0,
+    }
+}
+
+fn diag_with_verdict(verdict: VerifyResult) -> Diag {
+    let mut d = base_diag();
+    d.evidence = Some(Evidence {
+        dynamic_verdict: Some(verdict),
+        ..Default::default()
+    });
+    d
+}
+
+// ── Helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+fn sarif_result(diag: Diag) -> serde_json::Value {
+    let sarif = build_sarif(&[diag], Path::new("/scan_root"));
+    sarif["runs"][0]["results"][0].clone()
+}
+
+// ── Tests ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+#[test]
+fn sarif_confirmed_verdict_sets_partial_fingerprint() {
+    let verdict = VerifyResult {
+        finding_id: "deadbeef01234567".into(),
+        status: VerifyStatus::Confirmed,
+        triggered_payload: Some("sqli-tautology".into()),
+        reason: None,
+        inconclusive_reason: None,
+        detail: None,
+        attempts: vec![AttemptSummary {
+            payload_label: "sqli-tautology".into(),
+            exit_code: Some(0),
+            timed_out: false,
+            triggered: true,
+            sink_hit: true,
+        }],
+        toolchain_match: Some("exact".into()),
+    };
+
+    let result = sarif_result(diag_with_verdict(verdict));
+
+    assert_eq!(
+        result["partialFingerprints"]["dynamic_verdict_status"],
+        "Confirmed",
+        "partialFingerprints.dynamic_verdict_status must be 'Confirmed'"
+    );
+    assert!(
+        result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"].is_object(),
+        "properties.nyx_dynamic_verdict must be an object: {}",
+        result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"]
+    );
+    assert_eq!(
+        result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"]["status"],
+        "Confirmed",
+        "nyx_dynamic_verdict.status must be 'Confirmed'"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn sarif_not_confirmed_verdict_sets_partial_fingerprint() {
+    let verdict = VerifyResult {
+        finding_id: "deadbeef01234567".into(),
+        status: VerifyStatus::NotConfirmed,
+        triggered_payload: None,
+        reason: None,
+        inconclusive_reason: None,
+        detail: None,
+        attempts: vec![],
+        toolchain_match: Some("exact".into()),
+    };
+
+    let result = sarif_result(diag_with_verdict(verdict));
+
+    assert_eq!(
+        result["partialFingerprints"]["dynamic_verdict_status"],
+        "NotConfirmed",
+        "partialFingerprints.dynamic_verdict_status must be 'NotConfirmed'"
+    );
+    assert!(
+        result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"].is_object(),
+        "properties.nyx_dynamic_verdict must be an object"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn sarif_unsupported_verdict_sets_partial_fingerprint() {
+    let verdict = VerifyResult {
+        finding_id: "deadbeef01234567".into(),
+        status: VerifyStatus::Unsupported,
+        triggered_payload: None,
+        reason: Some(UnsupportedReason::NoPayloadsForCap),
+        inconclusive_reason: None,
+        detail: None,
+        attempts: vec![],
+        toolchain_match: None,
+    };
+
+    let result = sarif_result(diag_with_verdict(verdict));
+
+    assert_eq!(
+        result["partialFingerprints"]["dynamic_verdict_status"],
+        "Unsupported",
+        "partialFingerprints.dynamic_verdict_status must be 'Unsupported'"
+    );
+    assert!(
+        result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"].is_object(),
+        "properties.nyx_dynamic_verdict must be an object"
+    );
+    assert_eq!(
+        result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"]["reason"],
+        "NoPayloadsForCap",
+        "nyx_dynamic_verdict must carry the unsupported reason"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn sarif_inconclusive_verdict_sets_partial_fingerprint() {
+    let verdict = VerifyResult {
+        finding_id: "deadbeef01234567".into(),
+        status: VerifyStatus::Inconclusive,
+        triggered_payload: None,
+        reason: None,
+        inconclusive_reason: Some(InconclusiveReason::BuildFailed),
+        detail: Some("build failed after 3 attempts".into()),
+        attempts: vec![],
+        toolchain_match: None,
+    };
+
+    let result = sarif_result(diag_with_verdict(verdict));
+
+    assert_eq!(
+        result["partialFingerprints"]["dynamic_verdict_status"],
+        "Inconclusive",
+        "partialFingerprints.dynamic_verdict_status must be 'Inconclusive'"
+    );
+    assert!(
+        result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"].is_object(),
+        "properties.nyx_dynamic_verdict must be an object"
+    );
+    assert_eq!(
+        result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"]["inconclusive_reason"],
+        "BuildFailed",
+        "nyx_dynamic_verdict must carry the inconclusive reason"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn sarif_no_dynamic_verdict_omits_both_keys() {
+    let diag = base_diag();
+    let result = sarif_result(diag);
+
+    assert!(
+        result["partialFingerprints"].is_null() || result["partialFingerprints"] == serde_json::Value::Null,
+        "partialFingerprints must be absent when no dynamic verdict: {}",
+        result["partialFingerprints"]
+    );
+    assert!(
+        result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"].is_null() || result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"] == serde_json::Value::Null,
+        "properties.nyx_dynamic_verdict must be absent when no dynamic verdict"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn sarif_confirmed_verdict_nyx_dynamic_verdict_contains_triggered_payload() {
+    let verdict = VerifyResult {
+        finding_id: "deadbeef01234567".into(),
+        status: VerifyStatus::Confirmed,
+        triggered_payload: Some("cmd-injection-semicolon".into()),
+        reason: None,
+        inconclusive_reason: None,
+        detail: None,
+        attempts: vec![],
+        toolchain_match: Some("exact".into()),
+    };
+
+    let result = sarif_result(diag_with_verdict(verdict));
+
+    assert_eq!(
+        result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"]["triggered_payload"],
+        "cmd-injection-semicolon",
+        "triggered_payload must appear in nyx_dynamic_verdict"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn sarif_all_four_statuses_produce_partial_fingerprint() {
+    let statuses = [
+        (VerifyStatus::Confirmed, "Confirmed"),
+        (VerifyStatus::NotConfirmed, "NotConfirmed"),
+        (VerifyStatus::Unsupported, "Unsupported"),
+        (VerifyStatus::Inconclusive, "Inconclusive"),
+    ];
+
+    for (status, expected_str) in statuses {
+        let verdict = VerifyResult {
+            finding_id: "deadbeef01234567".into(),
+            status,
+            triggered_payload: None,
+            reason: None,
+            inconclusive_reason: None,
+            detail: None,
+            attempts: vec![],
+            toolchain_match: None,
+        };
+
+        let result = sarif_result(diag_with_verdict(verdict));
+
+        assert_eq!(
+            result["partialFingerprints"]["dynamic_verdict_status"],
+            expected_str,
+            "status {expected_str}: partialFingerprints.dynamic_verdict_status mismatch"
+        );
+        assert!(
+            result["properties"]["nyx_dynamic_verdict"].is_object(),
+            "status {expected_str}: properties.nyx_dynamic_verdict must be an object"
+        );
+    }
+}