# Playwright E2E Suite End-to-end tests for the full SurfSense stack (Next.js + FastAPI + Celery + Postgres + Redis). Designed to scale from one connector (Composio Drive in Phase 1) to every connector + manual file upload without rewriting the harness. ## Layout ``` tests/ ├── auth.setup.ts # one-time login, persists localStorage ├── smoke/ # tracer-bullet tests (dashboard renders) ├── connectors/ │ └── composio/ │ └── drive/ # Composio Google Drive — Phase 1 │ └── journey.spec.ts # connect -> select -> index -> canary assertion ├── fixtures/ # test.extend() fixtures │ ├── index.ts # named `test` exports per spec category │ ├── search-space.fixture.ts # apiToken + per-test search space │ └── connectors/ │ └── composio-drive.fixture.ts ├── helpers/ # reusable building blocks │ ├── api/ # backend HTTP helpers │ ├── ui/ # page-object selectors │ ├── waits/ # deterministic polling │ └── canary.ts # canary tokens + fixed Drive file ids └── README.md # this file ``` ## How the deterministic harness works There are **three layers of defense** against accidental real-world calls. None of them touch production code. 1. `surfsense_backend/tests/e2e/run_backend.py` and `run_celery.py` are separate entrypoints (not used by `python main.py`). They hijack `sys.modules["composio"]` BEFORE importing the app, swap in strict fakes for `langchain_litellm`/`langchain_openai`, and mount the `X-E2E-Scenario` middleware. 2. The fakes themselves are **strict**: every class implements `__getattr__` that raises `NotImplementedError` on unknown surface. Adding a new SDK call site without updating the fake fails CI loudly. 3. CI sets `HTTPS_PROXY=http://127.0.0.1:1` plus sentinel API keys (`COMPOSIO_API_KEY=e2e-deny-real-call-sentinel`). Any leaked outbound HTTP call fails before reaching the network. ## Running locally ```bash # 1. Bring up Postgres + Redis (Docker compose, supabase, whatever you use) docker compose up -d postgres redis # 2. Backend with E2E entrypoint (note: NOT `uv run main.py`) cd surfsense_backend uv run alembic upgrade head uv run python tests/e2e/run_backend.py & # 3. Celery worker with the same entrypoint pattern uv run python tests/e2e/run_celery.py & # 4. Run Playwright tests (auto-starts `pnpm dev` via webServer config) cd ../surfsense_web pnpm test:e2e ``` For CI behavior in one go: `pnpm test:e2e:headless`. To debug the Drive journey: `pnpm test:e2e -- connectors/composio/drive/journey.spec.ts --headed`. ## Adding a new connector The directory tree is designed so a new connector lives mostly inside its own folder. E2E is scoped to **one user expectation per connector**: the smallest browser journey that proves the user-visible outcome works. Follow this checklist: 1. **Backend fake.** Add a new file under `surfsense_backend/tests/e2e/fakes/_module.py` mirroring `composio_module.py`. Use `__getattr__` to raise on unknown surface. 2. **Hijack.** Wire the new module into `run_backend.py` and `run_celery.py` with `sys.modules[""] = `. 3. **Backend tests.** Put edge cases in backend tests, not Playwright: OAuth state validation in unit tests, and route/error branches in `surfsense_backend/tests/integration//`. 4. **Fixtures.** Drop a fixture file into `tests/fixtures/connectors/` that returns a pre-connected connector row. 5. **Journey spec.** Create exactly one `tests/connectors///journey.spec.ts` for the user expectation. For indexable connectors this usually means connect -> select scope -> index -> assert canary content. For connection-only connectors this means connect -> assert connected badge. 6. **Update this README's directory diagram.** Do not add separate Playwright specs for expired OAuth state, duplicate connectors, auth-expired classification, or route config persistence. Those belong in backend unit/integration tests such as `surfsense_backend/tests/unit/utils/test_oauth_security.py` and `surfsense_backend/tests/integration/composio/`. ## Why API-driven? Journey specs prefer a thin browser assertion followed by API-driven configuration/indexing because: - It keeps tests **deterministic** (no waiting on UI animation, React hydration, or Next.js compile time). - It exercises the **same backend code path** the UI eventually calls. - The expensive E2E assertion stays focused on what only E2E can prove: the cross-process seam from connector -> Celery -> indexing -> DB. UI-only tests live under `helpers/ui/` for future Phase 2 work (folder-tree drag-and-drop, indexing options switches, etc.).