# Phase 5 — Access / Surfaces (REST · MCP · chat doors) > Build after `04`. Together `04 + 05` ship the scraper-API product. > Reuses shipped infra: Identity/Tenancy, API keys, the chat agent + tool registry, the streaming layer, > Metering (`03c`), and Rocicorp Zero reactive sync. Locate code by symbol/grep. ## Objective Expose the `04` capability registry through three doors — REST + API keys, an MCP server, and chat tools — each generated from the one registry so the I/O contract can't drift. Every door is the same thin adapter with no business logic. ## Adapter shape (identical on every door) ``` parse input → validate against verb.input_schema → authn/authz → meter-gate (03c) → call the SAME executor (04) → serialize verb.output_schema → return cleaned data ``` The executor returns directly (`04`). ## The three doors | Door | Who | Auth | Status | |------|-----|------|--------| | REST + API keys | external developers | existing API-key infra | public day one | | MCP server | external agents (Cursor/ChatGPT/Claude) | OAuth 2.1 or bearer (at implementation) | fast-follow | | Chat tools | the in-app agent (`07`) | existing session + workspace | seed exists (`scrape_webpage`) | Routes are generated, so public REST on day one costs nothing extra. ## Chat surface The in-app product is the conversation: the user describes a need in plain language and the agent (`07`) picks and fills verbs. Raw typed verbs are exposed on REST/MCP for devs and external agents. The chat door classifies intent and routes: ``` "find / compare / what is / pull / right now" → ONE-SHOT → call verbs, answer now "watch / track / notify me / keep an eye / over time" → KEEP-WATCHING → hand to the ongoing mode (06) ``` ## MCP — two directions - **Serve MCP** (new door): our capabilities as a remote MCP server — Streamable-HTTP `/mcp`, stateless, bounded/paginated outputs, read-only verbs (least privilege). - **Consume MCP** (reuse): the BYO-`MCP_CONNECTOR` — the user's own external MCP tools inside our chat agent. Fix its routing-map gap here. ## Result delivery A chat tool call returns its data inline in the turn. Asynchronous results (e.g. the `06` ongoing mode writing between turns) reach the client via write-then-sync / stream: the worker writes rows and the client receives them over the existing SSE stream or a Zero-published table. ## Work items 1. Door generator: from the `04` registry emit (a) REST routes + models, (b) MCP tool schemas + handlers, (c) chat tool defs + handlers. 2. REST surface: public routes + API-key auth (reuse) + `03c` meter-gate. 3. Chat tools: generalize `scrape_webpage` into the registry-backed set (direct-return). 4. Intent routing: classify one-shot vs keep-watching; hand keep-watching to `06`. 5. MCP server (fast-follow): Streamable-HTTP `/mcp`, least-privilege; auth depth at implementation. 6. Consume-MCP fix: repair the BYO-`MCP_CONNECTOR` routing-map gap. ## Tests - A verb added to the registry appears on REST + MCP + chat with identical I/O. - REST without a valid key → 401; an over-budget call → blocked by the `03c` gate; a success charges once. - A chat scrape returns cleaned data inline in the same turn. - "compare X and Y" → one-shot; "watch X weekly" → routed to `06`. - A configured BYO MCP tool is reachable by the chat agent. ## Out of scope - Verbs, executors, billing units → `04`. - Keep-watching mechanism + its delivery channel → `06`. - The CI subagent + its prompt → `07`. - Legacy branded connectors (backward-compat hygiene, separate task). ## Open questions - MCP auth depth (decide at implementation). - Public REST rate-limiting / abuse posture. - Async delivery channel for `06` outputs: SSE stream vs Zero-published messages table (settled with `06`).