feat(automation): add empty Capability / Action / Trigger registries

Three registries under app/automations/registries/, each as its own
folder with the same SRP-per-file split (types.py for the dataclass,
store.py for the in-memory dict + register/get/all functions). All
three start empty; concrete entries land when the user signs off on
which capabilities / actions / triggers to include (step 2).

Capability (locked at v1-minimum five fields — see commit 2):
  - id, description, input_schema, output_schema, handler
  - CapabilityHandler = Callable[[dict[str, Any]], Awaitable[Any]]
  - Frozen, slotted dataclass (immutable post-registration).

ActionDefinition (v1-trim of design plan §4):
  - type, name, description, config_schema, handler
  - Defers output_contract (handled per-step by agent_task's
    config.output_schema), uses_capabilities (no static analysis
    needed until >1 action ships), and produces_artifacts (deferred
    alongside the artifact pipeline).

TriggerDefinition (declarative, no handler):
  - type, description, config_schema, payload_schema
  - No handler field — firing is a single dispatcher's
    responsibility, not a per-trigger one.

store.py contract for all three:
  - register_*: idempotent at process startup, raises on duplicate
  - get_*: returns None on miss
  - all_*: returns a defensive copy of the registry dict

Verified by an inline smoke test (10 checks): empty initial state,
registration and lookup work, duplicates raise, frozen dataclasses
reject mutation, snapshots are copies, handlers are awaitable.

Isolation invariant audit: grep across the full app/automations/
tree shows only three app.* imports, all of them
``from app.db import BaseModel, TimestampMixin`` in the model files.
No imports from app.agents.*, app.services.*, app.tasks.*,
app.routes.*, or any other business-logic module.
This commit is contained in:
CREDO23 2026-05-26 22:54:17 +02:00
parent be4d43d6c9
commit 7a96c0e29c
10 changed files with 291 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -2,4 +2,13 @@
from __future__ import annotations
__all__: list[str] = []
from .store import all_actions, get_action, register_action
from .types import ActionDefinition, ActionHandler
__all__ = [
"ActionDefinition",
"ActionHandler",
"all_actions",
"get_action",
"register_action",
]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
"""Action registry: in-memory dict + ``register_action`` API."""
from __future__ import annotations
from .types import ActionDefinition
_REGISTRY: dict[str, ActionDefinition] = {}
def register_action(action: ActionDefinition) -> None:
"""Add an action to the in-memory registry.
Raises ``ValueError`` on duplicate ``type`` registration runs
once per process, so a duplicate is always a bug.
"""
if action.type in _REGISTRY:
raise ValueError(
f"Action already registered: {action.type!r}"
)
_REGISTRY[action.type] = action
def get_action(action_type: str) -> ActionDefinition | None:
"""Look up one action by type. Returns ``None`` on miss."""
return _REGISTRY.get(action_type)
def all_actions() -> dict[str, ActionDefinition]:
"""Snapshot of the registry as a defensive copy."""
return dict(_REGISTRY)

View file

@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
"""``ActionDefinition`` dataclass — the v1-minimum action shape."""
from __future__ import annotations
from collections.abc import Awaitable, Callable
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Any
ActionHandler = Callable[[dict[str, Any]], Awaitable[Any]]
"""The signature every action handler must satisfy.
Identical in shape to ``CapabilityHandler`` both receive a
caller-validated input dict and return an arbitrary output. The
distinction is purely architectural: capabilities are the low-level
"what SurfSense can do" surface, actions are the user-facing
building blocks composed into a plan.
"""
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class ActionDefinition:
"""A user-facing step type the plan editor can compose.
v1 trims the dataclass to the five fields necessary for
registry dispatch and form rendering. The full design (§4)
includes ``output_contract``, ``uses_capabilities``, and
``produces_artifacts``; all three are deferred until a consumer
feature requires them:
- ``output_contract`` the loose ``agent_task`` action declares
its output shape per-step via ``config.output_schema``, so the
action-level contract is not needed in v1.
- ``uses_capabilities`` would let the NL generator do static
analysis of which capabilities each action invokes; deferred
because v1 ships a single (``agent_task``) action.
- ``produces_artifacts`` deferred alongside the artifact
pipeline (see §13 decision 26).
"""
type: str
name: str
description: str
config_schema: dict[str, Any]
handler: ActionHandler