feat: pre-commit run --all-files

metagpt/actions/action_node.py

@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ def dict_to_markdown(d, prefix="-", postfix="\n"):
 
 class ActionNode:
     """ActionNode is a tree of nodes."""
+
     mode: str
 
     # Action Context
@@ -70,8 +71,15 @@ class ActionNode:
     content: str
     instruct_content: BaseModel
 
-    def __init__(self, key: str, expected_type: Type, instruction: str, example: str, content: str = "",
-                 children: dict[str, "ActionNode"] = None):
+    def __init__(
+        self,
+        key: str,
+        expected_type: Type,
+        instruction: str,
+        example: str,
+        content: str = "",
+        children: dict[str, "ActionNode"] = None,
+    ):
         self.key = key
         self.expected_type = expected_type
         self.instruction = instruction

metagpt/actions/project_management_an.py

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ FULL_API_SPEC = ActionNode(
     key="Full API spec",
     expected_type=str,
     instruction="Describe all APIs using OpenAPI 3.0 spec that may be used by both frontend and backend. If front-end "
-                "and back-end communication is not required, leave it blank.",
+    "and back-end communication is not required, leave it blank.",
     example="openapi: 3.0.0 ...",
 )
 

metagpt/actions/write_code_review.py

@@ -154,11 +154,15 @@ class WriteCodeReview(Action):
                 code=iterative_code,
                 filename=self.context.code_doc.filename,
             )
-            cr_prompt = EXAMPLE_AND_INSTRUCTION.format(format_example=format_example, )
+            cr_prompt = EXAMPLE_AND_INSTRUCTION.format(
+                format_example=format_example,
+            )
             logger.info(
                 f"Code review and rewrite {self.context.code_doc.filename}: {i+1}/{k} | {len(iterative_code)=}, {len(self.context.code_doc.content)=}"
             )
-            result, rewrited_code = await self.write_code_review_and_rewrite(context_prompt, cr_prompt, self.context.code_doc.filename)
+            result, rewrited_code = await self.write_code_review_and_rewrite(
+                context_prompt, cr_prompt, self.context.code_doc.filename
+            )
             if "LBTM" in result:
                 iterative_code = rewrited_code
             elif "LGTM" in result:

metagpt/roles/architect.py

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ class Architect(Role):
         profile: str = "Architect",
         goal: str = "design a concise, usable, complete software system",
         constraints: str = "make sure the architecture is simple enough and use appropriate open source libraries."
-                           "Use same language as user requirement"
+        "Use same language as user requirement",
     ) -> None:
         """Initializes the Architect with given attributes."""
         super().__init__(name, profile, goal, constraints)

metagpt/roles/engineer.py

@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ class Engineer(Role):
         profile: str = "Engineer",
         goal: str = "write elegant, readable, extensible, efficient code",
         constraints: str = "the code should conform to standards like google-style and be modular and maintainable. "
-                           "Use same language as user requirement",
+        "Use same language as user requirement",
         n_borg: int = 1,
         use_code_review: bool = False,
     ) -> None:

metagpt/roles/project_manager.py

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ class ProjectManager(Role):
         name: str = "Eve",
         profile: str = "Project Manager",
         goal: str = "break down tasks according to PRD/technical design, generate a task list, and analyze task "
-            "dependencies to start with the prerequisite modules",
+        "dependencies to start with the prerequisite modules",
         constraints: str = "use same language as user requirement",
     ) -> None:
         """

metagpt/team.py

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
         Section 2.2.3.3 of RFC 135.
 """
 import warnings
+
 from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
 
 from metagpt.actions import UserRequirement
@@ -61,9 +62,12 @@ class Team(BaseModel):
         Deprecated: This method will be removed in the future.
         Please use the `run_project` method instead.
         """
-        warnings.warn("The 'start_project' method is deprecated and will be removed in the future. "
-                      "Please use the 'run_project' method instead.",
-                      DeprecationWarning, stacklevel=2)
+        warnings.warn(
+            "The 'start_project' method is deprecated and will be removed in the future. "
+            "Please use the 'run_project' method instead.",
+            DeprecationWarning,
+            stacklevel=2,
+        )
         return self.run_project(idea=idea, send_to=send_to)
 
     def _save(self):