apunkt/MetaGPT
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/FoundationAgents/MetaGPT.git synced 2026-06-05 14:55:18 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

使用code block做reflection

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Yizhou Chi 2024-09-06 10:31:01 +08:00
parent defca81ebb
commit 0e27e3d8be
2 changed files with 15 additions and 14 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

9
metagpt/actions/di/write_analysis_code.py
View file

@ -6,8 +6,6 @@
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
from metagpt.actions import Action
from metagpt.prompts.di.write_analysis_code import (
CHECK_DATA_PROMPT,
@ -30,9 +28,10 @@ class WriteAnalysisCode(Action):
)
rsp = await self._aask(reflection_prompt, system_msgs=[REFLECTION_SYSTEM_MSG])
reflection = json.loads(CodeParser.parse_code(block=None, text=rsp))
return reflection["improved_impl"]
# reflection = json.loads(CodeParser.parse_code(block=None, text=rsp))
# return reflection["improved_impl"]
reflection = CodeParser.parse_code(block=None, text=rsp)
return reflection
async def run(
self,

20
metagpt/prompts/di/write_analysis_code.py
View file

@ -40,15 +40,17 @@ Tests failed:
assert add(1, 2) == 3 # output: -1
assert add(1, 3) == 4 # output: -2
[reflection on previous impl]:
[reflection on previous impl]
The implementation failed the test cases where the input integers are 1 and 2. The issue arises because the code does not add the two integers together, but instead subtracts the second integer from the first. To fix this issue, we should change the operator from `-` to `+` in the return statement. This will ensure that the function returns the correct output for the given input.
[improved impl]:
[improved impl]
```python
def add(a: int, b: int) -> int:
"""
Given integers a and b, return the total value of a and b.
"""
return a + b
```
'''
REFLECTION_PROMPT = """
@ -60,17 +62,17 @@ Here is an example of debugging with reflection.
[context]
{context}
[previous impl]:
[previous impl]
{previous_impl}
[instruction]
Analyze your previous code and error in [context] step by step, provide me with improved method and code. Remember to follow [context] requirement. Don't forget to write code for steps behind the error step.
Output a json following the format:
```json
{{
"reflection": str = "Reflection on previous implementation",
"improved_impl": str = "Refined code after reflection (do not include nested code block here).",
}}
Output in the following format:
[reflection on previous impl]
...
[improved impl]:
```python
# your code
```
"""